Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Flek, Lucie, Jungs, Philipp Alexander, Karimi, Akbar, Saala, Timo, Schmid, Alexander, Schott, Matthias, Soldin, Philipp, Wiebusch, Christopher, Willemsen, Ulrich
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07470
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866917472065552384
author Flek, Lucie
Jungs, Philipp Alexander
Karimi, Akbar
Saala, Timo
Schmid, Alexander
Schott, Matthias
Soldin, Philipp
Wiebusch, Christopher
Willemsen, Ulrich
author_facet Flek, Lucie
Jungs, Philipp Alexander
Karimi, Akbar
Saala, Timo
Schmid, Alexander
Schott, Matthias
Soldin, Philipp
Wiebusch, Christopher
Willemsen, Ulrich
contents Neural networks (NNs) are inherently multidimensional classifiers that learn complex, non-linear relationships among input observables. While their flexibility enables unprecedented performance in high-energy physics (HEP) analyses, it also makes them sensitive to small variations in their inputs. Consequently, the propagation and estimation of systematic uncertainties in NN-based models remain an open challenge. There are indications that uncertainties derived in control regions or from nominal variations of input features can underestimate the true model uncertainty, potentially leaving biases unaccounted for. Inspired by insights from adversarial-attack studies in machine learning, we explore how subtle perturbations, fully consistent with the experimental uncertainties on the input observables, can lead to substantial changes in NN outputs, while keeping the one-dimensional and correlated input distributions nearly unchanged. Using a set of representative HEP tasks, including event classification and object identification, and testing across a variety of network architectures, we demonstrate that networks can be systematically "fooled" at significant rates within the allowed uncertainty envelopes. Building on this observation, we introduce a quantitative framework to probe and measure the hidden sensitivity of neural networks to realistic experimental variations, providing a practical path to evaluate and control their systematic uncertainty in physics analyses.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_07470
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Uncovering Hidden Systematics in Neural Network Models for High Energy Physics
Flek, Lucie
Jungs, Philipp Alexander
Karimi, Akbar
Saala, Timo
Schmid, Alexander
Schott, Matthias
Soldin, Philipp
Wiebusch, Christopher
Willemsen, Ulrich
Machine Learning
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Neural networks (NNs) are inherently multidimensional classifiers that learn complex, non-linear relationships among input observables. While their flexibility enables unprecedented performance in high-energy physics (HEP) analyses, it also makes them sensitive to small variations in their inputs. Consequently, the propagation and estimation of systematic uncertainties in NN-based models remain an open challenge. There are indications that uncertainties derived in control regions or from nominal variations of input features can underestimate the true model uncertainty, potentially leaving biases unaccounted for. Inspired by insights from adversarial-attack studies in machine learning, we explore how subtle perturbations, fully consistent with the experimental uncertainties on the input observables, can lead to substantial changes in NN outputs, while keeping the one-dimensional and correlated input distributions nearly unchanged. Using a set of representative HEP tasks, including event classification and object identification, and testing across a variety of network architectures, we demonstrate that networks can be systematically "fooled" at significant rates within the allowed uncertainty envelopes. Building on this observation, we introduce a quantitative framework to probe and measure the hidden sensitivity of neural networks to realistic experimental variations, providing a practical path to evaluate and control their systematic uncertainty in physics analyses.
title Uncovering Hidden Systematics in Neural Network Models for High Energy Physics
topic Machine Learning
High Energy Physics - Experiment
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07470