Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bhattacharyya, Sree, Khanna, Samarth, Chen, Leona, Craig, Lucas, Dilliraj, Tharun, Wang, James Z.
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07806
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915993604849664
author Bhattacharyya, Sree
Khanna, Samarth
Chen, Leona
Craig, Lucas
Dilliraj, Tharun
Wang, James Z.
author_facet Bhattacharyya, Sree
Khanna, Samarth
Chen, Leona
Craig, Lucas
Dilliraj, Tharun
Wang, James Z.
contents Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in settings where reliable self-assessment is critical. Assessing model reliability has evolved from using probabilistic correctness estimates to, more recently, eliciting verbalized confidence. Confidence, however, has been shown to be an inconsistent and overoptimistic predictor of model correctness. Drawing on cognitive appraisal theory, a framework from human psychology that decomposes self-evaluation into multiple components, we propose a multidimensional perspective on model self-assessment. We elicit six appraisal-based dimensions of self-assessment, alongside confidence, and evaluate their utility for predicting model failure across 12 LLMs and 38 tasks spanning eight domains. We find that competence-related appraisal dimensions, particularly effort and ability, consistently match or outperform confidence across most settings. Effort additionally yields less overoptimistic estimates that remain stable across model sizes. In contrast, affective dimensions provide marginally predictive signals. Furthermore, the most informative dimension varies systematically with task characteristics: effort is most predictive for reasoning-intensive tasks, while ability and confidence dominate on retrieval-oriented tasks. Broadly, our findings indicate that structured multidimensional self-assessment is a promising approach to improving the reliability and safety of language model deployment across diverse real-world settings.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_07806
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Beyond Confidence: Rethinking Self-Assessments for Performance Prediction in LLMs
Bhattacharyya, Sree
Khanna, Samarth
Chen, Leona
Craig, Lucas
Dilliraj, Tharun
Wang, James Z.
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in settings where reliable self-assessment is critical. Assessing model reliability has evolved from using probabilistic correctness estimates to, more recently, eliciting verbalized confidence. Confidence, however, has been shown to be an inconsistent and overoptimistic predictor of model correctness. Drawing on cognitive appraisal theory, a framework from human psychology that decomposes self-evaluation into multiple components, we propose a multidimensional perspective on model self-assessment. We elicit six appraisal-based dimensions of self-assessment, alongside confidence, and evaluate their utility for predicting model failure across 12 LLMs and 38 tasks spanning eight domains. We find that competence-related appraisal dimensions, particularly effort and ability, consistently match or outperform confidence across most settings. Effort additionally yields less overoptimistic estimates that remain stable across model sizes. In contrast, affective dimensions provide marginally predictive signals. Furthermore, the most informative dimension varies systematically with task characteristics: effort is most predictive for reasoning-intensive tasks, while ability and confidence dominate on retrieval-oriented tasks. Broadly, our findings indicate that structured multidimensional self-assessment is a promising approach to improving the reliability and safety of language model deployment across diverse real-world settings.
title Beyond Confidence: Rethinking Self-Assessments for Performance Prediction in LLMs
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07806