CyBiasBench: Benchmarking Bias in LLM Agents for Cyber-Attack Scenarios

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lim, Taein, Ju, Seongyong, Kim, Munhyeok, Kim, Hyunjun, Kim, Hoki
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866913103557427200
author Lim, Taein
Ju, Seongyong
Kim, Munhyeok
Kim, Hyunjun
Kim, Hoki
author_facet Lim, Taein
Ju, Seongyong
Kim, Munhyeok
Kim, Hyunjun
Kim, Hoki
contents Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in offensive cybersecurity. In this paper, we reveal an interesting phenomenon: different agents exhibit distinct attack patterns. Specifically, each agent exhibits an attack-selection bias, disproportionately concentrating its efforts on a narrow subset of attack families regardless of prompt variations. To systematically quantify this behavior, we introduce CyBiasBench, a comprehensive 630-session benchmark that evaluates five agents on three targets and four prompt conditions with ten attack families. We identify explicit bias across agents, with different dominant attack families and varying entropy levels in their attack-family allocation distributions. Such bias is better characterized as a trait of the agents, rather than a factor associated with the attack success rate. Furthermore, our experiments reveal a bias momentum effect, where agents resist explicit steering toward attack families that conflict with their bias. This forced distribution shift does not yield measurable improvements in attack performance. To ensure reproducibility and facilitate future research, we release an interactive result dashboard at https://trustworthyai.co.kr/CyBiasBench/ and a reproducibility artifact with aggregated session-level statistics and full evaluation scripts at https://github.com/Harry24k/CyBiasBench.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_07830
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle CyBiasBench: Benchmarking Bias in LLM Agents for Cyber-Attack Scenarios
Lim, Taein
Ju, Seongyong
Kim, Munhyeok
Kim, Hyunjun
Kim, Hoki
Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in offensive cybersecurity. In this paper, we reveal an interesting phenomenon: different agents exhibit distinct attack patterns. Specifically, each agent exhibits an attack-selection bias, disproportionately concentrating its efforts on a narrow subset of attack families regardless of prompt variations. To systematically quantify this behavior, we introduce CyBiasBench, a comprehensive 630-session benchmark that evaluates five agents on three targets and four prompt conditions with ten attack families. We identify explicit bias across agents, with different dominant attack families and varying entropy levels in their attack-family allocation distributions. Such bias is better characterized as a trait of the agents, rather than a factor associated with the attack success rate. Furthermore, our experiments reveal a bias momentum effect, where agents resist explicit steering toward attack families that conflict with their bias. This forced distribution shift does not yield measurable improvements in attack performance. To ensure reproducibility and facilitate future research, we release an interactive result dashboard at https://trustworthyai.co.kr/CyBiasBench/ and a reproducibility artifact with aggregated session-level statistics and full evaluation scripts at https://github.com/Harry24k/CyBiasBench.
title CyBiasBench: Benchmarking Bias in LLM Agents for Cyber-Attack Scenarios
topic Cryptography and Security
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07830