On the Tradeoffs of On-Device Generative Models in Federated Predictive Maintenance Systems
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917473215840256 |
|---|---|
| author | Milasheuski, Usevalad Baraldi, Piero Zio, Enrico Savazzi, Stefano |
| author_facet | Milasheuski, Usevalad Baraldi, Piero Zio, Enrico Savazzi, Stefano |
| contents | Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for preserving client data ownership and control over distributed Internet of Things (IoT) environments. While discriminative models dominate most FL use cases, recent advances in generative models -- such as Variational Autoencoders (VAE), Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), and Diffusion Models (DM) -- offer new opportunities for unsupervised anomaly detection in time series analysis, with relevant applications in predictive maintenance (PdM) in critical industrial infrastructures. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of VAEs, GANs, and DMs in the context of federated PdM. We analyze their performance and communication overhead under both full and partial federation setups, where only subsets of model components are shared. Building on this analysis, the paper proposes a novel taxonomy for federated generative models that formalizes partial component sharing as a principled mechanism for model personalization. Our experiments over a real-world time series dataset reveal distinct trade-offs in model utility, stability, and scalability, especially in heterogeneous and bandwidth-constrained FL settings. For the evaluated GAN-based configurations, full federation improves training stability relative to independent local training, although the model remains less robust than the VAE- and DDPM-based alternatives. For DMs, however, partial federation -- especially decoder sharing -- can outperform full federation in bandwidth-constrained, non-IID settings. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_07860 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On the Tradeoffs of On-Device Generative Models in Federated Predictive Maintenance Systems Milasheuski, Usevalad Baraldi, Piero Zio, Enrico Savazzi, Stefano Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for preserving client data ownership and control over distributed Internet of Things (IoT) environments. While discriminative models dominate most FL use cases, recent advances in generative models -- such as Variational Autoencoders (VAE), Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), and Diffusion Models (DM) -- offer new opportunities for unsupervised anomaly detection in time series analysis, with relevant applications in predictive maintenance (PdM) in critical industrial infrastructures. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of VAEs, GANs, and DMs in the context of federated PdM. We analyze their performance and communication overhead under both full and partial federation setups, where only subsets of model components are shared. Building on this analysis, the paper proposes a novel taxonomy for federated generative models that formalizes partial component sharing as a principled mechanism for model personalization. Our experiments over a real-world time series dataset reveal distinct trade-offs in model utility, stability, and scalability, especially in heterogeneous and bandwidth-constrained FL settings. For the evaluated GAN-based configurations, full federation improves training stability relative to independent local training, although the model remains less robust than the VAE- and DDPM-based alternatives. For DMs, however, partial federation -- especially decoder sharing -- can outperform full federation in bandwidth-constrained, non-IID settings. |
| title | On the Tradeoffs of On-Device Generative Models in Federated Predictive Maintenance Systems |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.07860 |