Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schaefer, Clemens, Tabak, Gil
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08565
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866918491126235136
author Schaefer, Clemens
Tabak, Gil
author_facet Schaefer, Clemens
Tabak, Gil
contents Microscaling is a critical technique for preserving the quality of Large Language Models (LLMs) quantized to ultra-low precision formats. Intuitively, finer block sizes should yield lower quantization error; however, a paradox recently identified in the literature demonstrates that standard abs-max scaling can actually degrade model quality as block sizes shrink. In this work, we investigate the underlying mechanics of this phenomenon. We demonstrate that this degradation is not an inherent limitation of finer granularity, but is primarily driven by heavy-tailed tensor distributions interacting poorly with the coarse upper quantization bins of the FP4 element format. Specifically, we show that i) preventing the scaling factor from underflowing to zero mitigates localized errors, ii) targeted algorithmic interventions like the 4-over-6 methodology effectively correct the quantization geometry for large elements, and iii) a brute-force search establishes an optimal baseline, confirming that the theoretical Mean Squared Error (MSE) strictly improves with finer block sizes. Ultimately, our findings reveal a valuable interchangeability: applying the correct algorithmic recipe allows standard, hardware-compliant formats (like OCP E4M3) to match the performance of custom, wider-exponent formats (like UE5M3). We validate these results across several large language models, fully resolving the block size paradox and achieving robust downstream perplexity improvements.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_08565
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Finer is Better (with the Right Scaling)
Schaefer, Clemens
Tabak, Gil
Machine Learning
Microscaling is a critical technique for preserving the quality of Large Language Models (LLMs) quantized to ultra-low precision formats. Intuitively, finer block sizes should yield lower quantization error; however, a paradox recently identified in the literature demonstrates that standard abs-max scaling can actually degrade model quality as block sizes shrink. In this work, we investigate the underlying mechanics of this phenomenon. We demonstrate that this degradation is not an inherent limitation of finer granularity, but is primarily driven by heavy-tailed tensor distributions interacting poorly with the coarse upper quantization bins of the FP4 element format. Specifically, we show that i) preventing the scaling factor from underflowing to zero mitigates localized errors, ii) targeted algorithmic interventions like the 4-over-6 methodology effectively correct the quantization geometry for large elements, and iii) a brute-force search establishes an optimal baseline, confirming that the theoretical Mean Squared Error (MSE) strictly improves with finer block sizes. Ultimately, our findings reveal a valuable interchangeability: applying the correct algorithmic recipe allows standard, hardware-compliant formats (like OCP E4M3) to match the performance of custom, wider-exponent formats (like UE5M3). We validate these results across several large language models, fully resolving the block size paradox and achieving robust downstream perplexity improvements.
title Finer is Better (with the Right Scaling)
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08565