VORT: Adaptive Power-Law Memory for NLP Transformers
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866914548008615936 |
|---|---|
| author | Mlaiki, Nabil |
| author_facet | Mlaiki, Nabil |
| contents | Standard Transformers impose near-exponential decay on the influence of distant tokens, conflicting with the power-law structure of long-range dependencies in natural language. We introduce the \emph{Variable-Order Retention Transformer} (\VORT{}), a memory architecture in which each ingested token is assigned a learnable fractional order α_i\in[δ,1] that governs a Grünwald--Letnikov power-law retention kernel. Because the fractional weighted sum is non-Markovian, we approximate it through a sum-of-exponentials (SOE) decomposition computed by Gauss--Laguerre quadrature on a Laplace-type integral representation of the kernel weights. Each exponential component admits a one-step Markovian recurrence at O(Sd_v) per step, where S=O(\log(T/\varepsilon)) terms suffice for \varepsilon-uniform accuracy on horizon [1,T]. Retrieval is keyed and associative via a linear-attention accumulator with an exact O(KSd_ϕd_v) -per-step recurrence. Four results are established: (i) an SOE approximation theorem with geometric convergence rate from the analyticity of the integrand after a log-change of variables; (ii) a quantisation bound valid on [δ,1] with correct analysis near α=0; (iii) a direct L^2 energy argument (Proposition) showing that for α>1/2 any mixture with fixed minimum decay rate Λ>0 incurs L^2([1,T]) error at least N_α(T)-C(Λ)\to\infty, with the Λ-dependence made explicit; and (iv) linear convergence of a gradient plasticity rule under the Polyak--Łojasiewicz condition. Two synthetic experiments confirm the architectural advantage: a Zipf-distributed retrieval benchmark and an entity label-copy task with uniform lag distribution, the latter ruling out prior-matching as an explanation for the power-law kernel's advantage. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_08966 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | VORT: Adaptive Power-Law Memory for NLP Transformers Mlaiki, Nabil Machine Learning 68T50, 68T07, 26A33, 41A25, 60G22 I.2.7; I.2.6; G.1.2 Standard Transformers impose near-exponential decay on the influence of distant tokens, conflicting with the power-law structure of long-range dependencies in natural language. We introduce the \emph{Variable-Order Retention Transformer} (\VORT{}), a memory architecture in which each ingested token is assigned a learnable fractional order α_i\in[δ,1] that governs a Grünwald--Letnikov power-law retention kernel. Because the fractional weighted sum is non-Markovian, we approximate it through a sum-of-exponentials (SOE) decomposition computed by Gauss--Laguerre quadrature on a Laplace-type integral representation of the kernel weights. Each exponential component admits a one-step Markovian recurrence at O(Sd_v) per step, where S=O(\log(T/\varepsilon)) terms suffice for \varepsilon-uniform accuracy on horizon [1,T]. Retrieval is keyed and associative via a linear-attention accumulator with an exact O(KSd_ϕd_v) -per-step recurrence. Four results are established: (i) an SOE approximation theorem with geometric convergence rate from the analyticity of the integrand after a log-change of variables; (ii) a quantisation bound valid on [δ,1] with correct analysis near α=0; (iii) a direct L^2 energy argument (Proposition) showing that for α>1/2 any mixture with fixed minimum decay rate Λ>0 incurs L^2([1,T]) error at least N_α(T)-C(Λ)\to\infty, with the Λ-dependence made explicit; and (iv) linear convergence of a gradient plasticity rule under the Polyak--Łojasiewicz condition. Two synthetic experiments confirm the architectural advantage: a Zipf-distributed retrieval benchmark and an entity label-copy task with uniform lag distribution, the latter ruling out prior-matching as an explanation for the power-law kernel's advantage. |
| title | VORT: Adaptive Power-Law Memory for NLP Transformers |
| topic | Machine Learning 68T50, 68T07, 26A33, 41A25, 60G22 I.2.7; I.2.6; G.1.2 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.08966 |