Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdalla, Mohamed, Abdalla, Sahar, Cappello, Alicia, Dowling, Kyrie, Metaxa, Danae, Widder, David G., Stinson, Catherine
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09680
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910207389466624
author Abdalla, Mohamed
Abdalla, Sahar
Cappello, Alicia
Dowling, Kyrie
Metaxa, Danae
Widder, David G.
Stinson, Catherine
author_facet Abdalla, Mohamed
Abdalla, Sahar
Cappello, Alicia
Dowling, Kyrie
Metaxa, Danae
Widder, David G.
Stinson, Catherine
contents Workplace norms in computer science have received growing attention due to a series of recent ethical scandals. One type of response has been a push to improve the ethics education provided to computer science students. Evidence for the effectiveness of ethics education remains mixed; some evidence suggests that norms are changing, while gaps between stated values and practice remain. Our focus here is on whether students, who have received some contemporary CS ethics education, are able to effectively apply ethical reasoning to their own decision-making in what is typically the first significant ethical decision of their careers: their job search. Our study examines the ethical decision making of 129 computer science students and recent graduates during their job searches. We find that most students prioritize factors like compensation, location, and workplace culture over ethical and social issues. Even when expressing ethical concerns, respondents often justify taking actions contradicting their moral views through commonly-shared explanations such as desire to make money or the perceived inability to avoid unethical workplaces. This work sheds light on the disconnect between ethics education and real-world CS graduate decision making. We offer insights for evolving curricula to better address practical ethical dilemmas, with implications for educators and industry.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_09680
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Cost-of-Ethics Crisis: Beliefs, Decisions, and Justifications in the Job Searches of Computer Science Students in Canada and the United States
Abdalla, Mohamed
Abdalla, Sahar
Cappello, Alicia
Dowling, Kyrie
Metaxa, Danae
Widder, David G.
Stinson, Catherine
Computers and Society
Workplace norms in computer science have received growing attention due to a series of recent ethical scandals. One type of response has been a push to improve the ethics education provided to computer science students. Evidence for the effectiveness of ethics education remains mixed; some evidence suggests that norms are changing, while gaps between stated values and practice remain. Our focus here is on whether students, who have received some contemporary CS ethics education, are able to effectively apply ethical reasoning to their own decision-making in what is typically the first significant ethical decision of their careers: their job search. Our study examines the ethical decision making of 129 computer science students and recent graduates during their job searches. We find that most students prioritize factors like compensation, location, and workplace culture over ethical and social issues. Even when expressing ethical concerns, respondents often justify taking actions contradicting their moral views through commonly-shared explanations such as desire to make money or the perceived inability to avoid unethical workplaces. This work sheds light on the disconnect between ethics education and real-world CS graduate decision making. We offer insights for evolving curricula to better address practical ethical dilemmas, with implications for educators and industry.
title Cost-of-Ethics Crisis: Beliefs, Decisions, and Justifications in the Job Searches of Computer Science Students in Canada and the United States
topic Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09680