Push and Pushback in Contesting AI: Demands for and Resistance to Accountability
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913110112075776 |
|---|---|
| author | Pi, Yulu Lichner, Lucas Lee, Jae Woo Xiao, Sijia Zhang, Renwen Singh, Jatinder |
| author_facet | Pi, Yulu Lichner, Lucas Lee, Jae Woo Xiao, Sijia Zhang, Renwen Singh, Jatinder |
| contents | As AI becomes increasingly embedded in daily life, it has been shown to fail critically, cause harm, and spark public controversy, prompting affected communities, workers, and public-interest groups to contest it. Yet how these contestations unfold in practice remains underexplored. We address this gap by developing an empirically grounded account of AI contestation dynamics. We do so through a thematic analysis of 43 real-world cases in which affected actors direct demands toward those responsible for AI development and deployment, seeking redress, influence, or changes to AI practices. Situating our work within Bovens's relational model of accountability, we conceptualize contestation as accountability-seeking: a dynamic, iterative process in which actors "from below" direct explicit demands at actors "from above," who respond by accepting, resisting, or circumventing accountability. Our analysis produces empirically grounded categories of contestation strategies, institutional response tactics, outcome types, and the contextual factors that shape them, illuminating how accountability is pursued and evaded in practice. We show that those being contested often deploy a range of strategies to limit their accountability. Based on these insights, we offer guidance for researchers, policymakers, advocates, and other stakeholders seeking to support effective AI contestation, with particular attention to anticipating and countering institutional strategies used to evade accountability. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_09793 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Push and Pushback in Contesting AI: Demands for and Resistance to Accountability Pi, Yulu Lichner, Lucas Lee, Jae Woo Xiao, Sijia Zhang, Renwen Singh, Jatinder Human-Computer Interaction As AI becomes increasingly embedded in daily life, it has been shown to fail critically, cause harm, and spark public controversy, prompting affected communities, workers, and public-interest groups to contest it. Yet how these contestations unfold in practice remains underexplored. We address this gap by developing an empirically grounded account of AI contestation dynamics. We do so through a thematic analysis of 43 real-world cases in which affected actors direct demands toward those responsible for AI development and deployment, seeking redress, influence, or changes to AI practices. Situating our work within Bovens's relational model of accountability, we conceptualize contestation as accountability-seeking: a dynamic, iterative process in which actors "from below" direct explicit demands at actors "from above," who respond by accepting, resisting, or circumventing accountability. Our analysis produces empirically grounded categories of contestation strategies, institutional response tactics, outcome types, and the contextual factors that shape them, illuminating how accountability is pursued and evaded in practice. We show that those being contested often deploy a range of strategies to limit their accountability. Based on these insights, we offer guidance for researchers, policymakers, advocates, and other stakeholders seeking to support effective AI contestation, with particular attention to anticipating and countering institutional strategies used to evade accountability. |
| title | Push and Pushback in Contesting AI: Demands for and Resistance to Accountability |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09793 |