Validating Coronal Magnetic Field Models Using Gaussian Separation
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866915999983337472 |
|---|---|
| author | Iyer, Abhinav G. Wheatland, Michael S. Welsch, Brian T. Liu, Yang Gilchrist, S. A. |
| author_facet | Iyer, Abhinav G. Wheatland, Michael S. Welsch, Brian T. Liu, Yang Gilchrist, S. A. |
| contents | Nonlinear Force-free Field (NLFFF) models are widely used to investigate coronal magnetic field structure in solar active regions, but methods to validate them remain limited. Here, we use Gaussian separation, recently applied to solar vector magnetogram data, to assess the accuracy of NLFFF models constructed with two methods: optimization and the current-field iteration (CFIT) implementation of the Grad-Rubin method. Gaussian separation partitions the photospheric vector magnetic field into three components associated with currents flowing below, above, and passing through the photosphere, respectively. Comparing the photospheric field components due to coronal currents in an NLFFF model with those in the original vector magnetogram data provides a check on the accuracy of the model's coronal currents. We consider NLFFF models constructed for the active region AR 11429. The photospheric signatures of coronal currents in both the models and the vector magnetogram data indicate currents flowing above and parallel to central, sheared polarity inversion lines (PILs), consistent with other recent studies. We find that while both models reproduce the coronal current signatures along the upper section of the main PIL, the CFIT model significantly alters the signature of a flux rope along the lower section of the PIL, including shifting its positive-polarity footpoint. These differences arise from modifications to the vector magnetogram boundary data when solving the NLFFF equations, and from the assumptions underlying the models. We propose Gaussian separation as a useful tool to validate coronal magnetic field models, in addition to existing methods. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_09841 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Validating Coronal Magnetic Field Models Using Gaussian Separation Iyer, Abhinav G. Wheatland, Michael S. Welsch, Brian T. Liu, Yang Gilchrist, S. A. Solar and Stellar Astrophysics Nonlinear Force-free Field (NLFFF) models are widely used to investigate coronal magnetic field structure in solar active regions, but methods to validate them remain limited. Here, we use Gaussian separation, recently applied to solar vector magnetogram data, to assess the accuracy of NLFFF models constructed with two methods: optimization and the current-field iteration (CFIT) implementation of the Grad-Rubin method. Gaussian separation partitions the photospheric vector magnetic field into three components associated with currents flowing below, above, and passing through the photosphere, respectively. Comparing the photospheric field components due to coronal currents in an NLFFF model with those in the original vector magnetogram data provides a check on the accuracy of the model's coronal currents. We consider NLFFF models constructed for the active region AR 11429. The photospheric signatures of coronal currents in both the models and the vector magnetogram data indicate currents flowing above and parallel to central, sheared polarity inversion lines (PILs), consistent with other recent studies. We find that while both models reproduce the coronal current signatures along the upper section of the main PIL, the CFIT model significantly alters the signature of a flux rope along the lower section of the PIL, including shifting its positive-polarity footpoint. These differences arise from modifications to the vector magnetogram boundary data when solving the NLFFF equations, and from the assumptions underlying the models. We propose Gaussian separation as a useful tool to validate coronal magnetic field models, in addition to existing methods. |
| title | Validating Coronal Magnetic Field Models Using Gaussian Separation |
| topic | Solar and Stellar Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09841 |