Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agents

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shan, Rong, Gao, Te, Zheng, Hang, Xi, Yunjia, Zhu, Jiachen, Zheng, Zeyu, Yu, Yong, Zhang, Weinan, Lin, Jianghao
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913110382608384
author Shan, Rong
Gao, Te
Zheng, Hang
Xi, Yunjia
Zhu, Jiachen
Zheng, Zeyu
Yu, Yong
Zhang, Weinan
Lin, Jianghao
author_facet Shan, Rong
Gao, Te
Zheng, Hang
Xi, Yunjia
Zhu, Jiachen
Zheng, Zeyu
Yu, Yong
Zhang, Weinan
Lin, Jianghao
contents The implicit policy of maintaining relatively stable acceptance rates at top AI conferences, despite exponentially growing submissions, introduces a critical structural vulnerability. This position paper characterizes a new systemic threat we term Agentic Denominator Gaming, in which a malicious actor deploys AI agents to generate and submit a large volume of superficially plausible but low-quality papers. Crucially, their objective is not the acceptance of low-quality papers, but rather to inflate the submission denominator and overwhelm reviewing capacity. Under a relatively stable acceptance rate, this dilution can systematically increase the publication probability of a small, targeted set of legitimate papers. We analyze the practical feasibility of this threat and its broader consequences, including intensified reviewer burnout, degraded review quality, and the emergence of industrialized automated agent mills. Finally, we propose and evaluate a range of mitigation strategies, and argue that durable protection will require system-level policy and incentive reforms, rather than relying primarily on technical detection alone.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_09915
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agents
Shan, Rong
Gao, Te
Zheng, Hang
Xi, Yunjia
Zhu, Jiachen
Zheng, Zeyu
Yu, Yong
Zhang, Weinan
Lin, Jianghao
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
The implicit policy of maintaining relatively stable acceptance rates at top AI conferences, despite exponentially growing submissions, introduces a critical structural vulnerability. This position paper characterizes a new systemic threat we term Agentic Denominator Gaming, in which a malicious actor deploys AI agents to generate and submit a large volume of superficially plausible but low-quality papers. Crucially, their objective is not the acceptance of low-quality papers, but rather to inflate the submission denominator and overwhelm reviewing capacity. Under a relatively stable acceptance rate, this dilution can systematically increase the publication probability of a small, targeted set of legitimate papers. We analyze the practical feasibility of this threat and its broader consequences, including intensified reviewer burnout, degraded review quality, and the emergence of industrialized automated agent mills. Finally, we propose and evaluate a range of mitigation strategies, and argue that durable protection will require system-level policy and incentive reforms, rather than relying primarily on technical detection alone.
title Position: Academic Conferences are Potentially Facing Denominator Gaming Caused by Fully Automated Scientific Agents
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.09915