A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914581246377984 |
|---|---|
| author | Baek, Jihyeon Lee, Seunghoon Kwon, Gitaek Park, Doohyun |
| author_facet | Baek, Jihyeon Lee, Seunghoon Kwon, Gitaek Park, Doohyun |
| contents | Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for building reliable AI systems, as models that produce outputs for invalid inputs cannot be trusted. Although deep learning (DL) is often assumed to outperform traditional machine learning (ML), medical imaging data are typically acquired under standardized protocols, leading to relatively constrained image variability in OOD detection tasks. This motivates a direct comparison between ML and DL approaches in this setting. The two approaches are evaluated on open datasets comprising over 60,000 fundus and non-fundus images across multiple resolutions. Both approaches achieved an AUROC of 1.000 and accuracies between 0.999 and 1.000 on internal and external validation sets, showing comparable detection performance. The ML approach, however, exhibited substantially lower end-to-end latency while maintaining equivalent accuracy, indicating greater computational efficiency. These results suggest that for OOD detection tasks of limited visual complexity, lightweight ML approaches can achieve DL-level performance with significantly reduced computational cost, supporting practical real-world deployment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_10181 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection Baek, Jihyeon Lee, Seunghoon Kwon, Gitaek Park, Doohyun Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is essential for building reliable AI systems, as models that produce outputs for invalid inputs cannot be trusted. Although deep learning (DL) is often assumed to outperform traditional machine learning (ML), medical imaging data are typically acquired under standardized protocols, leading to relatively constrained image variability in OOD detection tasks. This motivates a direct comparison between ML and DL approaches in this setting. The two approaches are evaluated on open datasets comprising over 60,000 fundus and non-fundus images across multiple resolutions. Both approaches achieved an AUROC of 1.000 and accuracies between 0.999 and 1.000 on internal and external validation sets, showing comparable detection performance. The ML approach, however, exhibited substantially lower end-to-end latency while maintaining equivalent accuracy, indicating greater computational efficiency. These results suggest that for OOD detection tasks of limited visual complexity, lightweight ML approaches can achieve DL-level performance with significantly reduced computational cost, supporting practical real-world deployment. |
| title | A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Out-of-Distribution Detection |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10181 |