Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Gao, Muhan, Chen, Zih-Ching, Huang, Kuan-Hao
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10828
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866914554436386816
author Gao, Muhan
Chen, Zih-Ching
Huang, Kuan-Hao
author_facet Gao, Muhan
Chen, Zih-Ching
Huang, Kuan-Hao
contents As large language models are increasingly deployed in retrieval-augmented generation and agentic systems that accumulate extensive context, understanding how distracting information affects long-context performance becomes critical. Prior work shows that semantically relevant yet misleading documents degrade performance, but the quantitative relationship between the proportion of distractors and performance remains unstudied. In this work, we systematically vary the hard-distractor proportion in fixed-length contexts, revealing a striking nonlinear pattern: as the proportion of hard distractors increases, performance drops sharply within the first small fraction, while the remainder of the range yields only marginal additional decline. We term this ''The First Drop of Ink'' effect, analogous to how a single drop of ink contaminates water. Our theoretical and empirical analyses grounded in attention mechanics show that hard distractors capture disproportionate attention even at small proportions, with diminishing marginal impact as their proportion grows. Controlled experiments further show that filtering gains mainly come from context-length reduction rather than distractor removal; substantial recovery requires reducing the hard-distractor proportion to near zero, highlighting the importance of upstream retrieval precision.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_10828
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The First Drop of Ink: Nonlinear Impact of Misleading Information in Long-Context Reasoning
Gao, Muhan
Chen, Zih-Ching
Huang, Kuan-Hao
Artificial Intelligence
As large language models are increasingly deployed in retrieval-augmented generation and agentic systems that accumulate extensive context, understanding how distracting information affects long-context performance becomes critical. Prior work shows that semantically relevant yet misleading documents degrade performance, but the quantitative relationship between the proportion of distractors and performance remains unstudied. In this work, we systematically vary the hard-distractor proportion in fixed-length contexts, revealing a striking nonlinear pattern: as the proportion of hard distractors increases, performance drops sharply within the first small fraction, while the remainder of the range yields only marginal additional decline. We term this ''The First Drop of Ink'' effect, analogous to how a single drop of ink contaminates water. Our theoretical and empirical analyses grounded in attention mechanics show that hard distractors capture disproportionate attention even at small proportions, with diminishing marginal impact as their proportion grows. Controlled experiments further show that filtering gains mainly come from context-length reduction rather than distractor removal; substantial recovery requires reducing the hard-distractor proportion to near zero, highlighting the importance of upstream retrieval precision.
title The First Drop of Ink: Nonlinear Impact of Misleading Information in Long-Context Reasoning
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10828