Counterfactual Stress Testing for Image Classification Models
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2026
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866918494760599552 |
|---|---|
| author | Stammel, Moritz Ribeiro, Fabio De Sousa Mehta, Raghav Roschewitz, Mélanie Glocker, Ben |
| author_facet | Stammel, Moritz Ribeiro, Fabio De Sousa Mehta, Raghav Roschewitz, Mélanie Glocker, Ben |
| contents | Deep learning models in medical imaging often fail when deployed in new clinical environments due to distribution shifts in demographics, scanner hardware, or acquisition protocols. A central challenge is underspecification, where models with similar validation performance exhibit divergent real-world failure modes. Although stress testing has emerged as a tool to assess this, current methods typically rely on simple, uninformed perturbations (e.g., brightness or contrast changes), which fail to capture clinically realistic variation and can overestimate robustness. In this work, we introduce a counterfactual stress testing framework based on causal generative models that create realistic "what if" images by intervening on attributes such as scanner type and patient sex while preserving anatomical identity, enabling controlled and semantically meaningful evaluation under targeted distribution shifts. Across two imaging modalities (chest X-ray and mammography), three model architectures, and multiple shift scenarios, we show that counterfactual stress tests provide a substantially more accurate proxy for real out-of-distribution performance than classical perturbations, capturing the direction and relative magnitude of performance changes as well as model ranking. These results suggest that causal generative models can serve as practical simulators for robustness assessment, offering a more reliable basis for evaluating medical AI systems prior to deployment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_10894 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Counterfactual Stress Testing for Image Classification Models Stammel, Moritz Ribeiro, Fabio De Sousa Mehta, Raghav Roschewitz, Mélanie Glocker, Ben Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Deep learning models in medical imaging often fail when deployed in new clinical environments due to distribution shifts in demographics, scanner hardware, or acquisition protocols. A central challenge is underspecification, where models with similar validation performance exhibit divergent real-world failure modes. Although stress testing has emerged as a tool to assess this, current methods typically rely on simple, uninformed perturbations (e.g., brightness or contrast changes), which fail to capture clinically realistic variation and can overestimate robustness. In this work, we introduce a counterfactual stress testing framework based on causal generative models that create realistic "what if" images by intervening on attributes such as scanner type and patient sex while preserving anatomical identity, enabling controlled and semantically meaningful evaluation under targeted distribution shifts. Across two imaging modalities (chest X-ray and mammography), three model architectures, and multiple shift scenarios, we show that counterfactual stress tests provide a substantially more accurate proxy for real out-of-distribution performance than classical perturbations, capturing the direction and relative magnitude of performance changes as well as model ranking. These results suggest that causal generative models can serve as practical simulators for robustness assessment, offering a more reliable basis for evaluating medical AI systems prior to deployment. |
| title | Counterfactual Stress Testing for Image Classification Models |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10894 |