Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11461 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911693671497728 |
|---|---|
| author | Chen, Haoxuan Liang, Tianming Zheng, Wei-Shi Hu, Jian-Fang |
| author_facet | Chen, Haoxuan Liang, Tianming Zheng, Wei-Shi Hu, Jian-Fang |
| contents | Reinforcement learning with verifiers (RLVR) has become a central paradigm for improving LLM reasoning, yet popular group-based optimization algorithms like GRPO often suffer from exploration collapse, where the models prematurely converge on a narrow set of high-scoring patterns, lacking the ability to explore new solutions. Recent efforts attempt to alleviate this by adding entropy regularization or diversity bonus. However, these approaches do not change the \textit{winner-takes-all} nature, where rollouts still compete for individual advantage rather than cooperating for maximizing global diversity. In this work, we propose Group Cooperative Policy Optimization (GCPO), which shifts the training paradigm from rollout competition to team cooperation. Specifically, GCPO replaces independent rollout scoring with team-level credit assignment: a rollout is rewarded by how much it contributes to the team's valid solution coverage, rather than its individual accuracy. This coverage is described as a determinant volume over reward-weighted semantic embeddings, where only correct and non-redundant rollouts contribute to this volume. During advantage estimation, GCPO redistributes the collective team reward to each single rollout according to its average marginal contribution to the team. This cooperative training paradigm routes optimization toward non-redundant correct reasoning paths. Experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that GCPO significantly improves both reasoning accuracy and solution diversity over existing approaches. Code will be released at https://github.com/bradybuddiemarch/gcpo. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_11461 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Breaking $\textit{Winner-Takes-All}$: Cooperative Policy Optimization Improves Diverse LLM Reasoning Chen, Haoxuan Liang, Tianming Zheng, Wei-Shi Hu, Jian-Fang Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning Reinforcement learning with verifiers (RLVR) has become a central paradigm for improving LLM reasoning, yet popular group-based optimization algorithms like GRPO often suffer from exploration collapse, where the models prematurely converge on a narrow set of high-scoring patterns, lacking the ability to explore new solutions. Recent efforts attempt to alleviate this by adding entropy regularization or diversity bonus. However, these approaches do not change the \textit{winner-takes-all} nature, where rollouts still compete for individual advantage rather than cooperating for maximizing global diversity. In this work, we propose Group Cooperative Policy Optimization (GCPO), which shifts the training paradigm from rollout competition to team cooperation. Specifically, GCPO replaces independent rollout scoring with team-level credit assignment: a rollout is rewarded by how much it contributes to the team's valid solution coverage, rather than its individual accuracy. This coverage is described as a determinant volume over reward-weighted semantic embeddings, where only correct and non-redundant rollouts contribute to this volume. During advantage estimation, GCPO redistributes the collective team reward to each single rollout according to its average marginal contribution to the team. This cooperative training paradigm routes optimization toward non-redundant correct reasoning paths. Experiments across multiple reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that GCPO significantly improves both reasoning accuracy and solution diversity over existing approaches. Code will be released at https://github.com/bradybuddiemarch/gcpo. |
| title | Breaking $\textit{Winner-Takes-All}$: Cooperative Policy Optimization Improves Diverse LLM Reasoning |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11461 |