Persistent and Conversational Multi-Method Explainability for Trustworthy Financial AI

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Makridis, Georgios, Fatouros, Georgios, Soldatos, John, Katsis, George, Kyriazis, Dimosthenis
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866918496510672896
author Makridis, Georgios
Fatouros, Georgios
Soldatos, John
Katsis, George
Kyriazis, Dimosthenis
author_facet Makridis, Georgios
Fatouros, Georgios
Soldatos, John
Katsis, George
Kyriazis, Dimosthenis
contents Financial institutions increasingly require AI explanations that are persistent, cross-validated across methods, and conversationally accessible to human decision-makers. We present an architecture for human-centered explainable AI in financial sentiment analysis that combines three contributions. First, we treat XAI artifacts -- LIME feature attributions, occlusion-based word importance scores, and saliency heatmaps -- as persistent, searchable objects in distributed S3-compatible storage with structured metadata and natural-language summaries, enabling semantic retrieval over explanation history and automatic index reconstruction after system failures. Second, we enable multi-method explanation triangulation, where a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) assistant compares and synthesizes results from multiple XAI methods applied to the same prediction, allowing users to assess explanation robustness through natural-language dialogue. Third, we evaluate the faithfulness of generated explanations using automated checks over grounding completeness, hallucinated claims, and method-attribution behavior. We demonstrate the architecture on an EXTRA-BRAIN financial sentiment analysis pipeline using FinBERT predictions and present evaluation results showing that constrained prompting reduces hallucination rate by 36\% and increases method-attribution citations by 73\% compared to naive prompting. We discuss implications for trustworthy, human-centered AI services in regulated financial environments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_11687
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Persistent and Conversational Multi-Method Explainability for Trustworthy Financial AI
Makridis, Georgios
Fatouros, Georgios
Soldatos, John
Katsis, George
Kyriazis, Dimosthenis
Artificial Intelligence
Financial institutions increasingly require AI explanations that are persistent, cross-validated across methods, and conversationally accessible to human decision-makers. We present an architecture for human-centered explainable AI in financial sentiment analysis that combines three contributions. First, we treat XAI artifacts -- LIME feature attributions, occlusion-based word importance scores, and saliency heatmaps -- as persistent, searchable objects in distributed S3-compatible storage with structured metadata and natural-language summaries, enabling semantic retrieval over explanation history and automatic index reconstruction after system failures. Second, we enable multi-method explanation triangulation, where a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) assistant compares and synthesizes results from multiple XAI methods applied to the same prediction, allowing users to assess explanation robustness through natural-language dialogue. Third, we evaluate the faithfulness of generated explanations using automated checks over grounding completeness, hallucinated claims, and method-attribution behavior. We demonstrate the architecture on an EXTRA-BRAIN financial sentiment analysis pipeline using FinBERT predictions and present evaluation results showing that constrained prompting reduces hallucination rate by 36\% and increases method-attribution citations by 73\% compared to naive prompting. We discuss implications for trustworthy, human-centered AI services in regulated financial environments.
title Persistent and Conversational Multi-Method Explainability for Trustworthy Financial AI
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11687