Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12079 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916004983996416 |
|---|---|
| author | Haltia, Alvar Hyvönen, Ville Kaski, Samuel |
| author_facet | Haltia, Alvar Hyvönen, Ville Kaski, Samuel |
| contents | Human-in-the-loop Bayesian optimization (HITL BO) methods utilize human expertise to improve the sample-efficiency of BO. Most HITL BO methods assume that a domain expert can quantify their knowledge, for instance by pinpointing query locations or specifying their prior beliefs about the location of the maximum as a probability distribution. However, since human expertise is often tacit and cannot be explicitly quantified, we consider a setting where domain knowledge of an expert is elicited via pairwise comparisons of designs. We interpret the expert's pairwise judgements as noisy evidence about the values of the observable objective function and develop a principled method for combining the information obtained via direct observations and pairwise queries. Specifically, we derive a cost-aware value-of-information acquisition function that balances direct observations against pairwise queries. The proposed method approaches the convex hull of the trajectories of the individual information sources: when pairwise queries are cheap it substantially improves sample-efficiency over observation-only BO, and when pairwise queries are costly or noisy, it recovers the performance of standard BO by relying on direct observations alone. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12079 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Elicitation-Augmented Bayesian Optimization Haltia, Alvar Hyvönen, Ville Kaski, Samuel Machine Learning Human-in-the-loop Bayesian optimization (HITL BO) methods utilize human expertise to improve the sample-efficiency of BO. Most HITL BO methods assume that a domain expert can quantify their knowledge, for instance by pinpointing query locations or specifying their prior beliefs about the location of the maximum as a probability distribution. However, since human expertise is often tacit and cannot be explicitly quantified, we consider a setting where domain knowledge of an expert is elicited via pairwise comparisons of designs. We interpret the expert's pairwise judgements as noisy evidence about the values of the observable objective function and develop a principled method for combining the information obtained via direct observations and pairwise queries. Specifically, we derive a cost-aware value-of-information acquisition function that balances direct observations against pairwise queries. The proposed method approaches the convex hull of the trajectories of the individual information sources: when pairwise queries are cheap it substantially improves sample-efficiency over observation-only BO, and when pairwise queries are costly or noisy, it recovers the performance of standard BO by relying on direct observations alone. |
| title | Elicitation-Augmented Bayesian Optimization |
| topic | Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12079 |