On set-like sunflower-free families of subspaces over finite fields

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Otal, Kamil
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910213057019904
author Otal, Kamil
author_facet Otal, Kamil
contents The Erdős--Rado sunflower problem admits two natural analogues in finite vector spaces, corresponding to two different ways of generalising the set-theoretic notion of a sunflower. The first, used by Ihringer and Kupavskii [FFA 110 (2026) 102746], requires the petals to be in general position over the kernel; the second, used in the subspace codes literature (cf.\ Etzion--Raviv [DAM 186 (2015) 87-97], Blokhuis--De Boeck--D'haeseleer [DCC 90 (2022) 2101-2111]), requires only that the kernel equals the pairwise intersection of distinct petals. We refer to the second version as a \emph{set-like sunflower}, following Ihringer and Kupavskii. In this note, we focus on the set-like setting. We observe that the constructions of Ihringer--Kupavskii, although correct under their (stronger) definition, do not yield set-like sunflower-free families: we exhibit explicit set-like sunflowers inside their Example~3.1. We then present a construction of set-like $s$-sunflower-free families of $k$-spaces, based on a manipulated version of the lifting construction. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic construction tailored to this setting.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12232
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle On set-like sunflower-free families of subspaces over finite fields
Otal, Kamil
Combinatorics
51E23, 05D05
The Erdős--Rado sunflower problem admits two natural analogues in finite vector spaces, corresponding to two different ways of generalising the set-theoretic notion of a sunflower. The first, used by Ihringer and Kupavskii [FFA 110 (2026) 102746], requires the petals to be in general position over the kernel; the second, used in the subspace codes literature (cf.\ Etzion--Raviv [DAM 186 (2015) 87-97], Blokhuis--De Boeck--D'haeseleer [DCC 90 (2022) 2101-2111]), requires only that the kernel equals the pairwise intersection of distinct petals. We refer to the second version as a \emph{set-like sunflower}, following Ihringer and Kupavskii. In this note, we focus on the set-like setting. We observe that the constructions of Ihringer--Kupavskii, although correct under their (stronger) definition, do not yield set-like sunflower-free families: we exhibit explicit set-like sunflowers inside their Example~3.1. We then present a construction of set-like $s$-sunflower-free families of $k$-spaces, based on a manipulated version of the lifting construction. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic construction tailored to this setting.
title On set-like sunflower-free families of subspaces over finite fields
topic Combinatorics
51E23, 05D05
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12232