Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12265 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911675553153024 |
|---|---|
| author | Martin, Sam Roger, Fabien |
| author_facet | Martin, Sam Roger, Fabien |
| contents | Using prompted language models as classifiers enables classification in domains with limited training data, but misses some of the robustness and performance benefits that fine-tuning can bring. We study whether training on multiple classification tasks, each with its own prompt, improves performance on new domains with new classification prompts. We show that such training partially generalizes to adjacent domains, improving classification performance on tasks that are unseen during training. However, we identify specific edge cases where the fine-tuned models fail to follow prompts, such as when the classification prompt changes completely while the data domain remains the same as during training. We show that classification training can be mixed with general instruction following training, and that (when done well) such training keeps the benefits of classification training and mitigates its generalization failures. Surprisingly, we see that this no-thinking supervised classification training can generalize to with-thinking classification and summarization, suggesting that no-thinking classification training might be instrumentally useful in building other kinds of classifiers and monitoring systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12265 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | How Useful Is Cross-Domain Generalization for Training LLM Monitors? Martin, Sam Roger, Fabien Artificial Intelligence Using prompted language models as classifiers enables classification in domains with limited training data, but misses some of the robustness and performance benefits that fine-tuning can bring. We study whether training on multiple classification tasks, each with its own prompt, improves performance on new domains with new classification prompts. We show that such training partially generalizes to adjacent domains, improving classification performance on tasks that are unseen during training. However, we identify specific edge cases where the fine-tuned models fail to follow prompts, such as when the classification prompt changes completely while the data domain remains the same as during training. We show that classification training can be mixed with general instruction following training, and that (when done well) such training keeps the benefits of classification training and mitigates its generalization failures. Surprisingly, we see that this no-thinking supervised classification training can generalize to with-thinking classification and summarization, suggesting that no-thinking classification training might be instrumentally useful in building other kinds of classifiers and monitoring systems. |
| title | How Useful Is Cross-Domain Generalization for Training LLM Monitors? |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12265 |