Question Difficulty Estimation for Large Language Models via Answer Plausibility Scoring

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mozafari, Jamshid, Piryani, Bhawna, Jatowt, Adam
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910213169217536
author Mozafari, Jamshid
Piryani, Bhawna
Jatowt, Adam
author_facet Mozafari, Jamshid
Piryani, Bhawna
Jatowt, Adam
contents Estimating question difficulty is a critical component in evaluating and improving large language models (LLMs) for question answering (QA). Existing approaches often rely on readability formulas, retrieval-based signals, or popularity statistics, which may not fully capture the reasoning challenges posed to modern LLMs. In this paper, we introduce Q-DAPS (Question Difficulty based on Answer Plausibility Scores) method, a novel approach that estimates question difficulty by computing the entropy of plausibility scores over candidate answers. We systematically evaluate Q-DAPS across four prominent QA datasets-TriviaQA, NQ, MuSiQue, and QASC-demonstrating that it consistently outperforms baselines. Moreover, Q-DAPS shows strong robustness across hyperparameter variations and question types. Extensive ablation studies further show that Q-DAPS remains robust across different plausibility estimation paradigms, model sizes, and realistic settings. Human evaluations further confirm strong alignment between Q-DAPS's difficulty estimates and human judgments of question difficulty. Overall, Q-DAPS provides an interpretable, scalable, and bias-resilient approach to question difficulty estimation in modern QA systems.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12398
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Question Difficulty Estimation for Large Language Models via Answer Plausibility Scoring
Mozafari, Jamshid
Piryani, Bhawna
Jatowt, Adam
Computation and Language
Information Retrieval
Estimating question difficulty is a critical component in evaluating and improving large language models (LLMs) for question answering (QA). Existing approaches often rely on readability formulas, retrieval-based signals, or popularity statistics, which may not fully capture the reasoning challenges posed to modern LLMs. In this paper, we introduce Q-DAPS (Question Difficulty based on Answer Plausibility Scores) method, a novel approach that estimates question difficulty by computing the entropy of plausibility scores over candidate answers. We systematically evaluate Q-DAPS across four prominent QA datasets-TriviaQA, NQ, MuSiQue, and QASC-demonstrating that it consistently outperforms baselines. Moreover, Q-DAPS shows strong robustness across hyperparameter variations and question types. Extensive ablation studies further show that Q-DAPS remains robust across different plausibility estimation paradigms, model sizes, and realistic settings. Human evaluations further confirm strong alignment between Q-DAPS's difficulty estimates and human judgments of question difficulty. Overall, Q-DAPS provides an interpretable, scalable, and bias-resilient approach to question difficulty estimation in modern QA systems.
title Question Difficulty Estimation for Large Language Models via Answer Plausibility Scoring
topic Computation and Language
Information Retrieval
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12398