Mitigating Cross-Lingual Cultural Inconsistencies in LLMs via Consensus-Driven Preference Optimisation

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Resck, Lucas, Augenstein, Isabelle, Korhonen, Anna
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910266025836544
author Resck, Lucas
Augenstein, Isabelle
Korhonen, Anna
author_facet Resck, Lucas
Augenstein, Isabelle
Korhonen, Anna
contents Despite their impressive capabilities, multilingual large language models (MLLMs) frequently exhibit inconsistent behaviour when the prompt's language changes. While such adaptation is generally desirable, it becomes a critical failure when a user's identity is explicitly defined. For instance, given a fixed British persona and an ambiguous everyday knowledge query about literature, the prompt's language frequently overwrites the system persona -- yielding Shakespeare in English but Cervantes in Spanish. To robustly quantify this Cross-lingual Cultural Inconsistency, we introduce Singleton Fleiss's $κ_S$, a metric mathematically resilient to hallucinations. For mitigation, we propose Cross-lingual Cultural Consistent Preference Optimisation (C-3PO), a consensus-driven alignment framework. C-3PO achieves up to a 0.13-point absolute increase in $κ_S$ over unaligned models, consistently outperforming strong prompting and representation steering baselines whilst preserving explicit user identities, cultural neutrality and intrinsic cultural knowledge. Empirical evaluations demonstrate this inconsistency disproportionately affects lower-resource languages like Indonesian and Persian. Finally, early decoding of intermediate layers reveals that MLLMs implicitly personalise outputs towards the prompt language's stereotypical culture as forward-pass representations stabilise.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12515
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Mitigating Cross-Lingual Cultural Inconsistencies in LLMs via Consensus-Driven Preference Optimisation
Resck, Lucas
Augenstein, Isabelle
Korhonen, Anna
Computation and Language
I.2.7; I.2.6
Despite their impressive capabilities, multilingual large language models (MLLMs) frequently exhibit inconsistent behaviour when the prompt's language changes. While such adaptation is generally desirable, it becomes a critical failure when a user's identity is explicitly defined. For instance, given a fixed British persona and an ambiguous everyday knowledge query about literature, the prompt's language frequently overwrites the system persona -- yielding Shakespeare in English but Cervantes in Spanish. To robustly quantify this Cross-lingual Cultural Inconsistency, we introduce Singleton Fleiss's $κ_S$, a metric mathematically resilient to hallucinations. For mitigation, we propose Cross-lingual Cultural Consistent Preference Optimisation (C-3PO), a consensus-driven alignment framework. C-3PO achieves up to a 0.13-point absolute increase in $κ_S$ over unaligned models, consistently outperforming strong prompting and representation steering baselines whilst preserving explicit user identities, cultural neutrality and intrinsic cultural knowledge. Empirical evaluations demonstrate this inconsistency disproportionately affects lower-resource languages like Indonesian and Persian. Finally, early decoding of intermediate layers reveals that MLLMs implicitly personalise outputs towards the prompt language's stereotypical culture as forward-pass representations stabilise.
title Mitigating Cross-Lingual Cultural Inconsistencies in LLMs via Consensus-Driven Preference Optimisation
topic Computation and Language
I.2.7; I.2.6
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12515