Cover-free families on graphs

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parida, Prangya, Moura, Lucia
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866914561061289984
author Parida, Prangya
Moura, Lucia
author_facet Parida, Prangya
Moura, Lucia
contents A family of subsets of a $t$-set is a \emph{$d$-cover-free family} or $d$-CFF if no subset in the family is contained in the union of any $d$ other subsets. Let $t(d, n)$ denote the minimum $t$ for which there exists a $d$-CFF on a $t$-set with $n$ subsets. Since a $1$-CFF is the same as a Sperner family, using Sperner's theorem, we get $t(1, n) \sim \log_{2}(n)$ as $n$ grows. Erdös, Frankl, and Füredi (JCTA, 1982) proved that $3.106\log_{2}(n) < t(2,n) < 5.512\log_{2}(n)$. This paper focuses on generalizing $1$-CFF and $2$-CFF using a graph $G$ where vertices correspond to subsets in the set system. A $G$-Sperner$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a $t$-set such that each edge of $G$ specifies a pair of subsets not contained in each other, where as a $G$-CFF$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a $t$-set such that it is $G$-Sperner and the union of a pair of subsets corresponding to each edge of $G$ does not contain any other subset in the family. Let $t_s(G)$ and $t(G)$ denote the minimum $t$ for which there exist a $G$-Sperner$(t, n)$ and a $G$-CFF$(t, n)$, respectively. In this way, $t_s(K_n) = t(1, n)$ and $t(K_n) = t(2, n)$. Firstly, we prove $t_s(G) = t(1, χ(G))$ for any simple graph $G$ and provide various upper and lower bounds for $t(G)$. The \emph{trivial bound}, $t(1, n) \leq t(G) \leq t(2, n)$ holds for any simple graph $G$ with no isolated vertex, with the lower bound tight for an infinite family of star graphs and the upper bound tight for complete graphs. We study when these bounds can be improved and give better constructive upper bounds for families of graphs such as stars, paths, cycles, wheels, and windmill graphs. In particular, a construction based on mixed-radix Gray codes yields $\log_{2}(n) \leq t(P_n) \leq t(C_n) \leq 1.893\log_{2}(n) + \mathcal{O}(1)$ where $P_n$ and $C_n$ are paths and cycles with $n$ vertices.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12634
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Cover-free families on graphs
Parida, Prangya
Moura, Lucia
Combinatorics
A family of subsets of a $t$-set is a \emph{$d$-cover-free family} or $d$-CFF if no subset in the family is contained in the union of any $d$ other subsets. Let $t(d, n)$ denote the minimum $t$ for which there exists a $d$-CFF on a $t$-set with $n$ subsets. Since a $1$-CFF is the same as a Sperner family, using Sperner's theorem, we get $t(1, n) \sim \log_{2}(n)$ as $n$ grows. Erdös, Frankl, and Füredi (JCTA, 1982) proved that $3.106\log_{2}(n) < t(2,n) < 5.512\log_{2}(n)$. This paper focuses on generalizing $1$-CFF and $2$-CFF using a graph $G$ where vertices correspond to subsets in the set system. A $G$-Sperner$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a $t$-set such that each edge of $G$ specifies a pair of subsets not contained in each other, where as a $G$-CFF$(t, n)$ is a family of subsets of a $t$-set such that it is $G$-Sperner and the union of a pair of subsets corresponding to each edge of $G$ does not contain any other subset in the family. Let $t_s(G)$ and $t(G)$ denote the minimum $t$ for which there exist a $G$-Sperner$(t, n)$ and a $G$-CFF$(t, n)$, respectively. In this way, $t_s(K_n) = t(1, n)$ and $t(K_n) = t(2, n)$. Firstly, we prove $t_s(G) = t(1, χ(G))$ for any simple graph $G$ and provide various upper and lower bounds for $t(G)$. The \emph{trivial bound}, $t(1, n) \leq t(G) \leq t(2, n)$ holds for any simple graph $G$ with no isolated vertex, with the lower bound tight for an infinite family of star graphs and the upper bound tight for complete graphs. We study when these bounds can be improved and give better constructive upper bounds for families of graphs such as stars, paths, cycles, wheels, and windmill graphs. In particular, a construction based on mixed-radix Gray codes yields $\log_{2}(n) \leq t(P_n) \leq t(C_n) \leq 1.893\log_{2}(n) + \mathcal{O}(1)$ where $P_n$ and $C_n$ are paths and cycles with $n$ vertices.
title Cover-free families on graphs
topic Combinatorics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12634