Co-Designing Organizational Justice Indicators for Algorithmic Systems
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866916006745604096 |
|---|---|
| author | Yamamoto, Fujiko Robledo Mattei, Nicholas Ragothaman, Pradeep Burke, Robin Voida, Amy |
| author_facet | Yamamoto, Fujiko Robledo Mattei, Nicholas Ragothaman, Pradeep Burke, Robin Voida, Amy |
| contents | Fairness in machine learning is often conceptualized narrowly in comparative, distributional terms. In studying stakeholders' concepts of fairness, we find that this framing is insufficient to capture the full range of issues raised. As an alternative, we propose organizational justice as a framework that subsumes distributional fairness as well as other normative concerns. We conduct a case study of organizational justice relative to personalized recommendation in the context of Kiva Microfunds, a nonprofit micro-lending organization whose mission is to increase financial access for underserved communities across the world. We report on the results of co-design workshops conducted with Kiva employees who are involved in different departments and whose roles often lead them to prioritize normative concerns that are most supportive of the stakeholders with whom they work most closely. We apply organizational justice to understand design trade-offs among different normative goals stakeholders invoke. Based on these goals, we identify a suite of metrics that Kiva employees can use to monitor and assess the recommender system's impact on their organizational justice concerns and to seed discussions within the organization about appropriate configuration and deployment of this system in context. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12643 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Co-Designing Organizational Justice Indicators for Algorithmic Systems Yamamoto, Fujiko Robledo Mattei, Nicholas Ragothaman, Pradeep Burke, Robin Voida, Amy Human-Computer Interaction Fairness in machine learning is often conceptualized narrowly in comparative, distributional terms. In studying stakeholders' concepts of fairness, we find that this framing is insufficient to capture the full range of issues raised. As an alternative, we propose organizational justice as a framework that subsumes distributional fairness as well as other normative concerns. We conduct a case study of organizational justice relative to personalized recommendation in the context of Kiva Microfunds, a nonprofit micro-lending organization whose mission is to increase financial access for underserved communities across the world. We report on the results of co-design workshops conducted with Kiva employees who are involved in different departments and whose roles often lead them to prioritize normative concerns that are most supportive of the stakeholders with whom they work most closely. We apply organizational justice to understand design trade-offs among different normative goals stakeholders invoke. Based on these goals, we identify a suite of metrics that Kiva employees can use to monitor and assess the recommender system's impact on their organizational justice concerns and to seed discussions within the organization about appropriate configuration and deployment of this system in context. |
| title | Co-Designing Organizational Justice Indicators for Algorithmic Systems |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12643 |