Beyond Cooperative Simulators: Generating Realistic User Personas for Robust Evaluation of LLM Agents

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Chopra, Harshita, Ghate, Kshitish, Caliskan, Aylin, Kohno, Tadayoshi, Shah, Chirag, Jaques, Natasha
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2026
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910215385907200
author Chopra, Harshita
Ghate, Kshitish
Caliskan, Aylin
Kohno, Tadayoshi
Shah, Chirag
Jaques, Natasha
author_facet Chopra, Harshita
Ghate, Kshitish
Caliskan, Aylin
Kohno, Tadayoshi
Shah, Chirag
Jaques, Natasha
contents Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in settings where they interact with a wide variety of people, including users who are unclear, impatient, or reluctant to share information. However, collecting real interaction data at scale remains expensive. The field has turned to LLM-based user simulators as stand-ins, but these simulators inherit the behavior of their underlying models: cooperative and homogeneous. As a result, agents that appear strong in simulation often fail under the unseen, diverse communication patterns of real users. To narrow this gap, we introduce Persona Policies (PPol), a plug-and-play control layer that induces realistic behavioral variation in user simulators while preserving the original task goals. Rather than hand-crafting personas, we cast persona generation as an LLM-driven evolutionary program search that optimizes a Python generator to discover behaviors and translate them into task-preserving roleplay policies. Candidate generators are guided by a multi-objective fitness score combining human-likeness with broad coverage of human behavioral patterns. Once optimized, the generator produces a diverse population of human-like personas for any task in the domain. Across tau^2-bench retail and airline domains, evolved PPol programs yield 33-62% absolute gains in fitness score over the baseline simulator. In a blinded evaluation, annotators rated PPol-conditioned users as human 80.4% of the time, close to real human traces and nearly twice as frequently as baseline simulators. Agents trained with PPol are more robust to challenging, out-of-distribution behaviors, improving task success by +17% relative to training only on existing simulated interactions. This offers a novel approach to strengthen simulator-based evaluation and training without changing tasks or rewards.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_12894
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Beyond Cooperative Simulators: Generating Realistic User Personas for Robust Evaluation of LLM Agents
Chopra, Harshita
Ghate, Kshitish
Caliskan, Aylin
Kohno, Tadayoshi
Shah, Chirag
Jaques, Natasha
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in settings where they interact with a wide variety of people, including users who are unclear, impatient, or reluctant to share information. However, collecting real interaction data at scale remains expensive. The field has turned to LLM-based user simulators as stand-ins, but these simulators inherit the behavior of their underlying models: cooperative and homogeneous. As a result, agents that appear strong in simulation often fail under the unseen, diverse communication patterns of real users. To narrow this gap, we introduce Persona Policies (PPol), a plug-and-play control layer that induces realistic behavioral variation in user simulators while preserving the original task goals. Rather than hand-crafting personas, we cast persona generation as an LLM-driven evolutionary program search that optimizes a Python generator to discover behaviors and translate them into task-preserving roleplay policies. Candidate generators are guided by a multi-objective fitness score combining human-likeness with broad coverage of human behavioral patterns. Once optimized, the generator produces a diverse population of human-like personas for any task in the domain. Across tau^2-bench retail and airline domains, evolved PPol programs yield 33-62% absolute gains in fitness score over the baseline simulator. In a blinded evaluation, annotators rated PPol-conditioned users as human 80.4% of the time, close to real human traces and nearly twice as frequently as baseline simulators. Agents trained with PPol are more robust to challenging, out-of-distribution behaviors, improving task success by +17% relative to training only on existing simulated interactions. This offers a novel approach to strengthen simulator-based evaluation and training without changing tasks or rewards.
title Beyond Cooperative Simulators: Generating Realistic User Personas for Robust Evaluation of LLM Agents
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.12894