Copertina

Bridging Legal Interpretation and Formal Logic: Faithfulness, Assumption, and the Future of AI Legal Reasoning

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Wang, Olivia Peiyu, Gilpin, Leilani H.
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2026
Soggetti:	Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Computers and Society
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

Toward Robust Legal Text Formalization into Defeasible Deontic Logic using LLMs
di: Horner, Elias, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction
di: Yang, Xinyu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Legal Fact Prediction: The Missing Piece in Legal Judgment Prediction
di: Liu, Junkai, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Aalap: AI Assistant for Legal & Paralegal Functions in India
di: Tiwari, Aman, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models
di: Dahl, Matthew, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluation of Large Language Models in Legal Applications: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions
di: Hu, Yiran, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Are LLMs Court-Ready? Evaluating Frontier Models on Indian Legal Reasoning
di: Juvekar, Kush, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

ArabLegalEval: A Multitask Benchmark for Assessing Arabic Legal Knowledge in Large Language Models
di: Hijazi, Faris, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Exploring Possibilities of AI-Powered Legal Assistance in Bangladesh through Large Language Modeling
di: Wasi, Azmine Toushik, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Benchmarking the Legal Reasoning of LLMs in Arabic Islamic Inheritance Cases
di: AlDahoul, Nouar, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Towards Robust Legal Reasoning: Harnessing Logical LLMs in Law
di: Kant, Manuj, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

LeMAJ (Legal LLM-as-a-Judge): Bridging Legal Reasoning and LLM Evaluation
di: Enguehard, Joseph, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Large Language Models' Complicit Responses to Illicit Instructions across Socio-Legal Contexts
di: Wang, Xing, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Bye-bye, Bluebook? Automating Legal Procedure with Large Language Models
di: Dahl, Matthew
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Place Matters: Comparing LLM Hallucination Rates for Place-Based Legal Queries
di: Curran, Damian, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

On Wednesdays, We Ask Questions: Optimizing "Active Listening" in Automated Legal Triage and Referral
di: Steenhuis, Quinten, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Multimodal Multi-Agent Empowered Legal Judgment Prediction
di: Kang, Zhaolu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

That's So FETCH: Fashioning Ensemble Techniques for LLM Classification in Civil Legal Intake and Referral
di: Steenhuis, Quinten
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How Should the Law Treat Future AI Systems? Fictional Legal Personhood versus Legal Identity
di: Alexander, Heather J., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice
di: Shi, Yuzhen, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Law in Silico: Simulating Legal Society with LLM-Based Agents
di: Wang, Yiding, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

JurisCTC: Enhancing Legal Judgment Prediction via Cross-Domain Transfer and Contrastive Learning
di: Kang, Zhaolu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

LLMs in Interpreting Legal Documents
di: Corbo, Simone
Pubblicazione: (2025)

On Verifiable Legal Reasoning: A Multi-Agent Framework with Formalized Knowledge Representations
di: Sadowski, Albert, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

LegalScore: Development of a Benchmark for Evaluating AI Models in Legal Career Exams in Brazil
di: Caparroz, Roberto, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Evaluating Legal Reasoning Traces with Legal Issue Tree Rubrics
di: Lee, Jinu, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Language Models and Logic Programs for Trustworthy Tax Reasoning
di: Jurayj, William, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Getting in the Door: Streamlining Intake in Civil Legal Services with Large Language Models
di: Steenhuis, Quinten, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

The Incomplete Bridge: How AI Research (Mis)Engages with Psychology
di: Jiang, Han, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Rules, Cases, and Reasoning: Positivist Legal Theory as a Framework for Pluralistic AI Alignment
di: Caputo, Nicholas A.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Legally Binding but Unfair? Towards Assessing Fairness of Privacy Policies
di: Freiberger, Vincent, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating Implicit Biases in LLM Reasoning through Logic Grid Puzzles
di: Jahara, Fatima, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Red Lines and Grey Zones in the Fog of War: Benchmarking Legal Risk, Moral Harm, and Regional Bias in Large Language Model Military Decision-Making
di: Drinkall, Toby
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Auditing of AI: Legal, Ethical and Technical Approaches
di: Mokander, Jakob
Pubblicazione: (2024)

No Argument Left Behind: Overlapping Chunks for Faster Processing of Arbitrarily Long Legal Texts
di: Fama, Israel, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

LegalChainReasoner: A Legal Chain-guided Framework for Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation
di: Shi, Weizhe, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Mining Legal Arguments to Study Judicial Formalism
di: Koref, Tomáš, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analysis: Implications for Legal Education and the Profession
di: Peoples, Lee
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Structured Definitions and Segmentations for Legal Reasoning in LLMs: A Study on Indian Legal Data
di: Khatri, Mann, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Domain-Partitioned Hybrid RAG for Legal Reasoning: Toward Modular and Explainable Legal AI for India
di: Goel, Rakshita, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)