Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning?
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909043282411520 |
|---|---|
| author | Mohan, Harshini Mridula Manjunath, Maanya Arya, Vipul Basha, S. H. Shabbeer Cheekatla, Nitin |
| author_facet | Mohan, Harshini Mridula Manjunath, Maanya Arya, Vipul Basha, S. H. Shabbeer Cheekatla, Nitin |
| contents | Deep learning has profoundly impacted domains such as computer vision and natural language processing by uncovering complex patterns in vast datasets. However, the reliance on extensive labeled data poses significant challenges, including resource constraints and annotation errors, particularly in training Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformers due to a larger number of parameters. Active learning offers a promising solution to reduce labeling burdens by strategically selecting the most informative samples for annotation. However, the current active learning frameworks are time-intensive which select the samples iteratively with the help of initial candidate models. This study investigates the feasibility of using CNNs and transformers with randomly initialized weights, eliminating the need for initial candidate models while achieving results comparable to active learning frameworks that depend on such candidate models. We evaluate three confidence-based sampling strategies: high confidence (HC), low confidence (LC), and a combination of high confidence in the early stages of training and low confidence at later stages of training (HCLC). Among these, mostly LC demonstrated the best performance in our experiments, showcasing its effectiveness as an active learning strategy without the need for candidate models. Further, extensive experiments verify the robustness of the proposed active learning methods. By challenging traditional frameworks, the proposed work introduces a streamlined approach to active learning, advancing efficiency and flexibility across diverse datasets and domains. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_14689 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning? Mohan, Harshini Mridula Manjunath, Maanya Arya, Vipul Basha, S. H. Shabbeer Cheekatla, Nitin Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Deep learning has profoundly impacted domains such as computer vision and natural language processing by uncovering complex patterns in vast datasets. However, the reliance on extensive labeled data poses significant challenges, including resource constraints and annotation errors, particularly in training Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformers due to a larger number of parameters. Active learning offers a promising solution to reduce labeling burdens by strategically selecting the most informative samples for annotation. However, the current active learning frameworks are time-intensive which select the samples iteratively with the help of initial candidate models. This study investigates the feasibility of using CNNs and transformers with randomly initialized weights, eliminating the need for initial candidate models while achieving results comparable to active learning frameworks that depend on such candidate models. We evaluate three confidence-based sampling strategies: high confidence (HC), low confidence (LC), and a combination of high confidence in the early stages of training and low confidence at later stages of training (HCLC). Among these, mostly LC demonstrated the best performance in our experiments, showcasing its effectiveness as an active learning strategy without the need for candidate models. Further, extensive experiments verify the robustness of the proposed active learning methods. By challenging traditional frameworks, the proposed work introduces a streamlined approach to active learning, advancing efficiency and flexibility across diverse datasets and domains. |
| title | Are Candidate Models Really Needed for Active Learning? |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14689 |