Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14853 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917522127716352 |
|---|---|
| author | Wang, Shuli |
| author_facet | Wang, Shuli |
| contents | Semantic IDs (SIDs) define the generation space of generative recommendation and directly determine its personalization ceiling. However, existing tokenizers are trained independently with retrieval objectives, leaving personalization signals fully decoupled from the SID construction process -- a fundamental gap that causes generative retrieval to persistently lag behind discriminative ranking. In this paper, we rethink the essence of SIDs: \emph{ranking seeks argmax in item space while retrieval seeks argmax in token space; both are the same problem solved at different granularities.} Based on this insight, we propose \DIG (\textbf{D}iscrimination \textbf{I}s \textbf{G}eneration), which embeds the tokenizer inside a discriminative ranking model for end-to-end training -- the ranker naturally becomes a retrieval model, yielding two models from a single training run. \DIG is organized around a \emph{feature assignment taxonomy}: item-intrinsic static features are encoded into SIDs, user-item cross features (u2i) implicitly drive codebook boundaries toward recommendation decision boundaries during training, and an MLP$_\mathrm{u2t}$ distillation module approximates u2i at the token level for inference. Experiments on three public benchmarks and two industrial datasets demonstrate that \DIG simultaneously improves ranking, retrieval, and unified retrieval-ranking quality. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_14853 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Discrimination Is Generation: Unifying Ranking and Retrieval from a Tokenizer Perspective Wang, Shuli Information Retrieval Semantic IDs (SIDs) define the generation space of generative recommendation and directly determine its personalization ceiling. However, existing tokenizers are trained independently with retrieval objectives, leaving personalization signals fully decoupled from the SID construction process -- a fundamental gap that causes generative retrieval to persistently lag behind discriminative ranking. In this paper, we rethink the essence of SIDs: \emph{ranking seeks argmax in item space while retrieval seeks argmax in token space; both are the same problem solved at different granularities.} Based on this insight, we propose \DIG (\textbf{D}iscrimination \textbf{I}s \textbf{G}eneration), which embeds the tokenizer inside a discriminative ranking model for end-to-end training -- the ranker naturally becomes a retrieval model, yielding two models from a single training run. \DIG is organized around a \emph{feature assignment taxonomy}: item-intrinsic static features are encoded into SIDs, user-item cross features (u2i) implicitly drive codebook boundaries toward recommendation decision boundaries during training, and an MLP$_\mathrm{u2t}$ distillation module approximates u2i at the token level for inference. Experiments on three public benchmarks and two industrial datasets demonstrate that \DIG simultaneously improves ranking, retrieval, and unified retrieval-ranking quality. |
| title | Discrimination Is Generation: Unifying Ranking and Retrieval from a Tokenizer Perspective |
| topic | Information Retrieval |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14853 |