Do Biological Structural Guarantees Earn Their Complexity?
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866909044289044480 |
|---|---|
| author | Banu, Bogdan |
| author_facet | Banu, Bogdan |
| contents | Biologically-inspired AI agent frameworks claim reliability benefits through structural guarantees adapted from gene regulatory networks, immune systems, and metabolic control. These claims are rarely tested empirically against simpler alternatives. We present three deep benchmarks: metabolic priority gating, autoinducer-based quorum sensing, and Bayesian stagnation detection, each comparing a biologically-grounded implementation against a naive non-biological alternative and an ablated control, across 1,000 trials per seed and 10 seeds (10M+ data points total). |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_15225 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do Biological Structural Guarantees Earn Their Complexity? Banu, Bogdan Quantitative Methods Artificial Intelligence Biologically-inspired AI agent frameworks claim reliability benefits through structural guarantees adapted from gene regulatory networks, immune systems, and metabolic control. These claims are rarely tested empirically against simpler alternatives. We present three deep benchmarks: metabolic priority gating, autoinducer-based quorum sensing, and Bayesian stagnation detection, each comparing a biologically-grounded implementation against a naive non-biological alternative and an ablated control, across 1,000 trials per seed and 10 seeds (10M+ data points total). |
| title | Do Biological Structural Guarantees Earn Their Complexity? |
| topic | Quantitative Methods Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15225 |