CAPS: Cascaded Adaptive Pairwise Selection for Efficient Parallel Reasoning

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Fangzhou, Xing, Shuo, Li, Peiran, Yang, Siyuan, Ge, Qianwen, Yamada, Kazunori, Zhang, Ziming, Zhang, Haichong, Tu, Zhengzhong
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866914568770420736
author Lin, Fangzhou
Xing, Shuo
Li, Peiran
Yang, Siyuan
Ge, Qianwen
Yamada, Kazunori
Zhang, Ziming
Zhang, Haichong
Tu, Zhengzhong
author_facet Lin, Fangzhou
Xing, Shuo
Li, Peiran
Yang, Siyuan
Ge, Qianwen
Yamada, Kazunori
Zhang, Ziming
Zhang, Haichong
Tu, Zhengzhong
contents Parallel reasoning, where a generator samples many candidate solutions and an aggregator selects the best, is one of the most effective forms of test-time scaling in large language models, and pairwise self-verification has become its strongest aggregation primitive. Yet pairwise verification carries a heavy cost: each judgment reads two complete solutions in full, and existing methods perform tens of such judgments per problem regardless of whether the comparison is informative. We introduce CAPS (Cascaded Adaptive Pairwise Selection), an inference-only framework that allocates verifier compute non-uniformly along two orthogonal axes: an evidence axis that adapts how much of each candidate the judge sees, and a distribution axis that adapts how comparisons are spread across the pool. CAPS instantiates these into a four-stage cascade with an optional rescue subroutine, and admits a closed-form verifier-token cost in which the per-candidate marginal cost is roughly halved relative to uniform full-evidence schedules. On four self-verifying models (Qwen3-14B, GPT-OSS-20B, Qwen3-4B-Instruct/Thinking) and five reasoning benchmarks spanning code (LiveCodeBench-v5/v6, CodeContests) and math (AIME 2025, HMMT 2025), CAPS outperforms the leading pairwise verifier on 14 of 20 suites while using 25.4% of its verifier-token budget on code, and outperforms pointwise self-verification on all 20. The trade-off suites admit an interpretable diagnostic in terms of the verifier's accuracy at partial versus full evidence, providing a concrete pre-deployment check for cascade suitability.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_15513
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle CAPS: Cascaded Adaptive Pairwise Selection for Efficient Parallel Reasoning
Lin, Fangzhou
Xing, Shuo
Li, Peiran
Yang, Siyuan
Ge, Qianwen
Yamada, Kazunori
Zhang, Ziming
Zhang, Haichong
Tu, Zhengzhong
Artificial Intelligence
Parallel reasoning, where a generator samples many candidate solutions and an aggregator selects the best, is one of the most effective forms of test-time scaling in large language models, and pairwise self-verification has become its strongest aggregation primitive. Yet pairwise verification carries a heavy cost: each judgment reads two complete solutions in full, and existing methods perform tens of such judgments per problem regardless of whether the comparison is informative. We introduce CAPS (Cascaded Adaptive Pairwise Selection), an inference-only framework that allocates verifier compute non-uniformly along two orthogonal axes: an evidence axis that adapts how much of each candidate the judge sees, and a distribution axis that adapts how comparisons are spread across the pool. CAPS instantiates these into a four-stage cascade with an optional rescue subroutine, and admits a closed-form verifier-token cost in which the per-candidate marginal cost is roughly halved relative to uniform full-evidence schedules. On four self-verifying models (Qwen3-14B, GPT-OSS-20B, Qwen3-4B-Instruct/Thinking) and five reasoning benchmarks spanning code (LiveCodeBench-v5/v6, CodeContests) and math (AIME 2025, HMMT 2025), CAPS outperforms the leading pairwise verifier on 14 of 20 suites while using 25.4% of its verifier-token budget on code, and outperforms pointwise self-verification on all 20. The trade-off suites admit an interpretable diagnostic in terms of the verifier's accuracy at partial versus full evidence, providing a concrete pre-deployment check for cascade suitability.
title CAPS: Cascaded Adaptive Pairwise Selection for Efficient Parallel Reasoning
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15513