Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15520 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917498972012544 |
|---|---|
| author | Gao, Xian Hui, Bo Sun, Min-Te Ku, Wei-Shinn |
| author_facet | Gao, Xian Hui, Bo Sun, Min-Te Ku, Wei-Shinn |
| contents | Data attribution has become an important component of pricing, auditing, and governance in machine learning pipelines, yet most attribution methods implicitly assume that attribution values faithfully reflect participants' contributions. We show that this assumption can fail: a single participant in a standard distributed training workflow can substantially inflate its measured attribution value while preserving global utility. Our attribution-first attack uses latent optimization to inject small synthetic batches that preserve utility while exploiting non-IID label coverage and evaluator sensitivities. Across datasets, models, and multiple marginal-utility evaluators, the attack consistently increases the adversary's attribution value and reshapes the relative attribution structure among benign clients without degrading accuracy or triggering geometry-based defenses. These results show that attribution itself forms a new attack surface and motivate the development of attribution-robust and incentive-compatible scoring mechanisms. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_15520 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributed Gao, Xian Hui, Bo Sun, Min-Te Ku, Wei-Shinn Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing Data attribution has become an important component of pricing, auditing, and governance in machine learning pipelines, yet most attribution methods implicitly assume that attribution values faithfully reflect participants' contributions. We show that this assumption can fail: a single participant in a standard distributed training workflow can substantially inflate its measured attribution value while preserving global utility. Our attribution-first attack uses latent optimization to inject small synthetic batches that preserve utility while exploiting non-IID label coverage and evaluator sensitivities. Across datasets, models, and multiple marginal-utility evaluators, the attack consistently increases the adversary's attribution value and reshapes the relative attribution structure among benign clients without degrading accuracy or triggering geometry-based defenses. These results show that attribution itself forms a new attack surface and motivate the development of attribution-robust and incentive-compatible scoring mechanisms. |
| title | On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributed |
| topic | Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15520 |