Do Less, Achieve More: Do We Need Every-Step Optimization for RL Fine-tuning of Diffusion Models?
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914568964407296 |
|---|---|
| author | Yan, Renye Cheng, Jikang Sun, Shikun Sun, Yi Wu, You Peng, Wei Wang, Zongwei Liang, Ling Xing, Junliang Cai, Yimao |
| author_facet | Yan, Renye Cheng, Jikang Sun, Shikun Sun, Yi Wu, You Peng, Wei Wang, Zongwei Liang, Ling Xing, Junliang Cai, Yimao |
| contents | Despite strong image-generation performance, diffusion models' reconstruction objectives limit alignment with human preferences. RL enables such alignment through explicit rewards. However, most studies apply RL to the full denoising trajectory, making it computationally costly and weakening preference alignment, i.e., doing more but achieving less. We observe that the impact of RL fine-tuning varies significantly across denoising stages. In the early stage, image structures are unstable and distant from the final reward signal. Applying RL at this stage leads to delayed rewards and action-reward mismatching, resulting in high variance and inefficient updates. Conversely, in the later stage, reward gains saturate, and continued training tends to overfit local details, intensifying reward hacking. To tackle these challenges, we propose AdaScope, an RL-enhanced plug-in that improves generation quality while reducing computational cost. Specifically, AdaScope adaptively identifies the optimal intervention timing for RL by perceiving the structural evolution and semantic consistency during denoising, and dynamically terminates training once the denoising converges and reward gains saturate. As a result, it achieves a rare 'dual benefit': a reduction in computational costs alongside a significant performance improvement. We offer theoretical grounds for the design of AdaScope. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, AdaScope improves performance by 66% while cutting computational cost by 59%. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_15855 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Do Less, Achieve More: Do We Need Every-Step Optimization for RL Fine-tuning of Diffusion Models? Yan, Renye Cheng, Jikang Sun, Shikun Sun, Yi Wu, You Peng, Wei Wang, Zongwei Liang, Ling Xing, Junliang Cai, Yimao Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Despite strong image-generation performance, diffusion models' reconstruction objectives limit alignment with human preferences. RL enables such alignment through explicit rewards. However, most studies apply RL to the full denoising trajectory, making it computationally costly and weakening preference alignment, i.e., doing more but achieving less. We observe that the impact of RL fine-tuning varies significantly across denoising stages. In the early stage, image structures are unstable and distant from the final reward signal. Applying RL at this stage leads to delayed rewards and action-reward mismatching, resulting in high variance and inefficient updates. Conversely, in the later stage, reward gains saturate, and continued training tends to overfit local details, intensifying reward hacking. To tackle these challenges, we propose AdaScope, an RL-enhanced plug-in that improves generation quality while reducing computational cost. Specifically, AdaScope adaptively identifies the optimal intervention timing for RL by perceiving the structural evolution and semantic consistency during denoising, and dynamically terminates training once the denoising converges and reward gains saturate. As a result, it achieves a rare 'dual benefit': a reduction in computational costs alongside a significant performance improvement. We offer theoretical grounds for the design of AdaScope. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, AdaScope improves performance by 66% while cutting computational cost by 59%. |
| title | Do Less, Achieve More: Do We Need Every-Step Optimization for RL Fine-tuning of Diffusion Models? |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15855 |