Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gutoreva, Alina, Tsim, Fendi, Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16197
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914569872474112
author Gutoreva, Alina
Tsim, Fendi
Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni
author_facet Gutoreva, Alina
Tsim, Fendi
Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni
contents This position paper argues that safety and alignment cannot be achieved by constraining an external system: they must emerge from the co-regulatory design of the human--AI cognitive system as a whole ("AI as Part of Self"). Contemporary AI increasingly participates in attention allocation, reasoning, synthesis, and decision-making, shaping the very cognitive processes through which humans form beliefs, make decisions, and constitute their sense of self. Humans and AI occupy complementary epistemic roles under mutual constraint, forming a symbiotic cognitive unit whose co-regulation -- not the external control of either party alone -- is the proper locus of alignment. We identify the risks of unstructured delegation: deskilling, automation bias, transfer of epistemic authority, and oracle-style centralization of knowledge. Drawing on System~0 cognition theory, we further show that AI operates prior to conscious deliberation, shaping the pre-attentive infrastructures through which agency and trust are negotiated -- a level that conventional oversight cannot reach. We conclude with design principles for cognitive co-regulation addressed to ML engineers and governance bodies. The goal of this work is to guide human cognition toward resilience and epistemic agency at the foundation of human selfhood.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_16197
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Position: AI as Part of Self -- Extending the Mind Requires Cognitive Co-Regulation
Gutoreva, Alina
Tsim, Fendi
Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni
Human-Computer Interaction
This position paper argues that safety and alignment cannot be achieved by constraining an external system: they must emerge from the co-regulatory design of the human--AI cognitive system as a whole ("AI as Part of Self"). Contemporary AI increasingly participates in attention allocation, reasoning, synthesis, and decision-making, shaping the very cognitive processes through which humans form beliefs, make decisions, and constitute their sense of self. Humans and AI occupy complementary epistemic roles under mutual constraint, forming a symbiotic cognitive unit whose co-regulation -- not the external control of either party alone -- is the proper locus of alignment. We identify the risks of unstructured delegation: deskilling, automation bias, transfer of epistemic authority, and oracle-style centralization of knowledge. Drawing on System~0 cognition theory, we further show that AI operates prior to conscious deliberation, shaping the pre-attentive infrastructures through which agency and trust are negotiated -- a level that conventional oversight cannot reach. We conclude with design principles for cognitive co-regulation addressed to ML engineers and governance bodies. The goal of this work is to guide human cognition toward resilience and epistemic agency at the foundation of human selfhood.
title Position: AI as Part of Self -- Extending the Mind Requires Cognitive Co-Regulation
topic Human-Computer Interaction
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16197