From Reactive to Proactive: A Multi-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of 480 AI Incidents and a Data-Driven Governance Compliance Framework

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Mumtaz, Ummara, Mumtaz, Summaya
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2026
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866916017601511424
author Mumtaz, Ummara
Mumtaz, Summaya
author_facet Mumtaz, Ummara
Mumtaz, Summaya
contents Artificial intelligence systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet it remains unclear whether existing governance frameworks ensure accountability after deployment. This study makes two contributions. First, it presents a cross-regulatory empirical analysis of 480 real-world AI incidents from the AI Incident Database (AIID), evaluating their alignment with post-deployment provisions in three major governance frameworks: the EU AI Act (Articles 72-73), the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (MANAGE and GOVERN functions), and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR Articles 22, 33-35). The results reveal substantial governance gaps across these frameworks, indicating persistent weaknesses in post-deployment accountability. Second, based on these findings, the study proposes the Proactive AI Governance Compliance Framework (PAGCF), a four-phase lifecycle methodology designed to shift governance from reactive incident response toward pre-deployment compliance assurance. The framework includes risk-stratified governance tiers, an implementation checklist linked to specific regulatory provisions, and a projected impact analysis that uses internal monitoring as a proxy for proactive governance capacity.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_16281
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle From Reactive to Proactive: A Multi-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of 480 AI Incidents and a Data-Driven Governance Compliance Framework
Mumtaz, Ummara
Mumtaz, Summaya
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial intelligence systems are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, yet it remains unclear whether existing governance frameworks ensure accountability after deployment. This study makes two contributions. First, it presents a cross-regulatory empirical analysis of 480 real-world AI incidents from the AI Incident Database (AIID), evaluating their alignment with post-deployment provisions in three major governance frameworks: the EU AI Act (Articles 72-73), the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (MANAGE and GOVERN functions), and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR Articles 22, 33-35). The results reveal substantial governance gaps across these frameworks, indicating persistent weaknesses in post-deployment accountability. Second, based on these findings, the study proposes the Proactive AI Governance Compliance Framework (PAGCF), a four-phase lifecycle methodology designed to shift governance from reactive incident response toward pre-deployment compliance assurance. The framework includes risk-stratified governance tiers, an implementation checklist linked to specific regulatory provisions, and a projected impact analysis that uses internal monitoring as a proxy for proactive governance capacity.
title From Reactive to Proactive: A Multi-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of 480 AI Incidents and a Data-Driven Governance Compliance Framework
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.16281