Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17176 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913136237346816 |
|---|---|
| author | Sun, Zhaoyue Xu, Hainiu Uusberg, Andero Gross, James J. Slovak, Petr He, Yulan |
| author_facet | Sun, Zhaoyue Xu, Hainiu Uusberg, Andero Gross, James J. Slovak, Petr He, Yulan |
| contents | Emotion understanding is a core capability for LLMs to interact effectively with humans, yet existing evaluation paradigms rely on discrete emotion label prediction and fail to capture the cognitive processes underlying emotion generation. Grounded in appraisal theory, we introduce CAREBench, the first benchmark with complete inferential chain annotations from both first- and third-person perspectives on real-world narratives, spanning appraisal reasoning, appraisal ratings, and multi-label emotion annotation. We propose a process-level evaluation framework and conduct systematic experiments across six LLMs organized around four research questions. We find that stronger models match or surpass human observers on certain tasks, yet fall short on appraisal reasoning and positive emotion recognition; performance across chain steps and sensitivity to appraisal interventions exhibit dissociations across models; and current models have not internalized the mechanisms needed to capture human subjective heterogeneity. These findings suggest that downstream emotion prediction metrics may overestimate LLMs' true emotion understanding, and CAREBench provides a foundation for more diagnostically informative evaluation of LLMs' affective cognitive capabilities. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_17176 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | CAREBench: Evaluating LLMs' Emotion Understanding by Assessing Cognitive Appraisal Reasoning Sun, Zhaoyue Xu, Hainiu Uusberg, Andero Gross, James J. Slovak, Petr He, Yulan Artificial Intelligence Emotion understanding is a core capability for LLMs to interact effectively with humans, yet existing evaluation paradigms rely on discrete emotion label prediction and fail to capture the cognitive processes underlying emotion generation. Grounded in appraisal theory, we introduce CAREBench, the first benchmark with complete inferential chain annotations from both first- and third-person perspectives on real-world narratives, spanning appraisal reasoning, appraisal ratings, and multi-label emotion annotation. We propose a process-level evaluation framework and conduct systematic experiments across six LLMs organized around four research questions. We find that stronger models match or surpass human observers on certain tasks, yet fall short on appraisal reasoning and positive emotion recognition; performance across chain steps and sensitivity to appraisal interventions exhibit dissociations across models; and current models have not internalized the mechanisms needed to capture human subjective heterogeneity. These findings suggest that downstream emotion prediction metrics may overestimate LLMs' true emotion understanding, and CAREBench provides a foundation for more diagnostically informative evaluation of LLMs' affective cognitive capabilities. |
| title | CAREBench: Evaluating LLMs' Emotion Understanding by Assessing Cognitive Appraisal Reasoning |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17176 |