ReCrit: Transition-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Scientific Critic Reasoning

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu, Wanghan, Zhou, Yuhao, Zhao, Hengyuan, Li, Shuo, Yu, Dianzhi, Yin, Zhenfei, Hu, Yaowen, Xu, Fengli, Ouyang, Wanli, Zhang, Wenlong, Bai, Lei
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866918510055129088
author Xu, Wanghan
Zhou, Yuhao
Zhao, Hengyuan
Li, Shuo
Yu, Dianzhi
Yin, Zhenfei
Hu, Yaowen
Xu, Fengli
Ouyang, Wanli
Zhang, Wenlong
Bai, Lei
author_facet Xu, Wanghan
Zhou, Yuhao
Zhao, Hengyuan
Li, Shuo
Yu, Dianzhi
Yin, Zhenfei
Hu, Yaowen
Xu, Fengli
Ouyang, Wanli
Zhang, Wenlong
Bai, Lei
contents Large language models can fail in critic interaction not only by answering incorrectly, but also by abandoning an initially correct scientific solution after user criticism. This is especially risky in scientific reasoning, where user criticism can turn a valid answer into an incorrect one. We frame critic interaction as an inter-turn correctness-transition problem rather than a final-answer accuracy problem, and identify three challenges: transition awareness, decoupling useful correction from harmful sycophancy, and scalable rollout. We propose ReCrit, a transition-aware reinforcement learning framework that decomposes Initial-to-Critic behavior into four quadrants: Correction, Sycophancy, Robustness, and Boundary. ReCrit rewards correction and robustness, penalizes sycophancy, and treats persistent errors as weak boundary signals. To make interaction training practical, ReCrit further uses dynamic asynchronous rollout with tail-adaptive completion to reduce rollout waiting. On three scientific reasoning benchmarks, ChemBench, TRQA, and EarthSE, ReCrit improves average Critic accuracy from 38.15 to 51.49 on Qwen3.5-4B and from 45.40 to 55.59 on Qwen3.5-9B. Ablations show that final-answer rewards provide little interaction-level gain, while transition-aware rewards and quadrant weighting produce more distinguishable training signals and larger net Critic-stage improvement. The code is available at https://github.com/black-yt/ReCrit .
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_18799
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle ReCrit: Transition-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Scientific Critic Reasoning
Xu, Wanghan
Zhou, Yuhao
Zhao, Hengyuan
Li, Shuo
Yu, Dianzhi
Yin, Zhenfei
Hu, Yaowen
Xu, Fengli
Ouyang, Wanli
Zhang, Wenlong
Bai, Lei
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
Large language models can fail in critic interaction not only by answering incorrectly, but also by abandoning an initially correct scientific solution after user criticism. This is especially risky in scientific reasoning, where user criticism can turn a valid answer into an incorrect one. We frame critic interaction as an inter-turn correctness-transition problem rather than a final-answer accuracy problem, and identify three challenges: transition awareness, decoupling useful correction from harmful sycophancy, and scalable rollout. We propose ReCrit, a transition-aware reinforcement learning framework that decomposes Initial-to-Critic behavior into four quadrants: Correction, Sycophancy, Robustness, and Boundary. ReCrit rewards correction and robustness, penalizes sycophancy, and treats persistent errors as weak boundary signals. To make interaction training practical, ReCrit further uses dynamic asynchronous rollout with tail-adaptive completion to reduce rollout waiting. On three scientific reasoning benchmarks, ChemBench, TRQA, and EarthSE, ReCrit improves average Critic accuracy from 38.15 to 51.49 on Qwen3.5-4B and from 45.40 to 55.59 on Qwen3.5-9B. Ablations show that final-answer rewards provide little interaction-level gain, while transition-aware rewards and quadrant weighting produce more distinguishable training signals and larger net Critic-stage improvement. The code is available at https://github.com/black-yt/ReCrit .
title ReCrit: Transition-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Scientific Critic Reasoning
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18799