Guardrail Selection in Line Charts to Contextualize Persuasive Visualizations
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909055086231552 |
|---|---|
| author | Nadib, Khandaker Abrar Kogan, Marina Lex, Alexander Lisnic, Maxim |
| author_facet | Nadib, Khandaker Abrar Kogan, Marina Lex, Alexander Lisnic, Maxim |
| contents | Charts used for persuasion can easily veer into being outright misleading when, for instance, cherry-picked data is paired with a deceptive caption, as is commonly encountered on social media. The rise of interactive time-series data explorers for hotly debated topics makes such framing easy to produce and spread. Post-hoc interventions like fact-checking often arrive too late and suffer from persistence of belief. Prior work suggests that guardrails, in the form of contextual comparison lines embedded directly into charts, can reduce these effects. We propose and evaluate a practical set of guardrail sampling strategies for implementing such contextual lines in real systems. In a preregistered mixed-design study with two real-world scenarios (COVID-19 and Stocks), participants viewed persuasive charts with different sets of guardrails and reported trust, estimated rank in the dataset, expressed their perceived completeness of context, as well as subjective preference for different tasks. Across scenarios, guardrails improved trust, accuracy of performance judgments, and perceived completeness of context compared to the control. Taken together, the study offers practical guardrail sampling methods, evidence of their contextual benefits, and insights into participants' preferences. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_19017 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Guardrail Selection in Line Charts to Contextualize Persuasive Visualizations Nadib, Khandaker Abrar Kogan, Marina Lex, Alexander Lisnic, Maxim Human-Computer Interaction Charts used for persuasion can easily veer into being outright misleading when, for instance, cherry-picked data is paired with a deceptive caption, as is commonly encountered on social media. The rise of interactive time-series data explorers for hotly debated topics makes such framing easy to produce and spread. Post-hoc interventions like fact-checking often arrive too late and suffer from persistence of belief. Prior work suggests that guardrails, in the form of contextual comparison lines embedded directly into charts, can reduce these effects. We propose and evaluate a practical set of guardrail sampling strategies for implementing such contextual lines in real systems. In a preregistered mixed-design study with two real-world scenarios (COVID-19 and Stocks), participants viewed persuasive charts with different sets of guardrails and reported trust, estimated rank in the dataset, expressed their perceived completeness of context, as well as subjective preference for different tasks. Across scenarios, guardrails improved trust, accuracy of performance judgments, and perceived completeness of context compared to the control. Taken together, the study offers practical guardrail sampling methods, evidence of their contextual benefits, and insights into participants' preferences. |
| title | Guardrail Selection in Line Charts to Contextualize Persuasive Visualizations |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19017 |