Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19513 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866916025971245056 |
|---|---|
| author | Walsberg, Erik |
| author_facet | Walsberg, Erik |
| contents | Motivated by the "composition theorems" of Chernikov-Hempel and Abd Aldaim-Conant-Terry we introduce $k$-trace definability between first order theories. Any theory which is $k$-trace definable in a NIP theory is $k$-NIP and any theory which is $2$-trace definable in a stable theory is $2$-NFOP. All known examples of $k$-NIP theories are $k$-trace definable in NIP theories. We show that for several of the main examples of $k$-NIP theories $T$ there is a NIP theory $T^*$ such that $T$ is the (unique up to a certain notion of equivalence) universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in $T^*$. For example the theory of Hilbert space is the universal theory which is $2$-trace definable in RCF, the theory of the generic class $k$ nilpotent Lie algebra over $\mathbb{F}_p$ is the universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in the theory of infinite $\mathbb{F}_p$-vector spaces, the theory of the generic $k$-hypergraph is the universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in the theory of a set with two elements, and the theory of Uryshon space is the universal theory which is $2$-trace definable in the theory of $(\mathbb{R}; +, <)$. We construct the universal theory $D_k(T)$ which is $k$-trace definable in an arbitrary theory $T$. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_19513 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Trace definability IV: higher arity notions Walsberg, Erik Logic Motivated by the "composition theorems" of Chernikov-Hempel and Abd Aldaim-Conant-Terry we introduce $k$-trace definability between first order theories. Any theory which is $k$-trace definable in a NIP theory is $k$-NIP and any theory which is $2$-trace definable in a stable theory is $2$-NFOP. All known examples of $k$-NIP theories are $k$-trace definable in NIP theories. We show that for several of the main examples of $k$-NIP theories $T$ there is a NIP theory $T^*$ such that $T$ is the (unique up to a certain notion of equivalence) universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in $T^*$. For example the theory of Hilbert space is the universal theory which is $2$-trace definable in RCF, the theory of the generic class $k$ nilpotent Lie algebra over $\mathbb{F}_p$ is the universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in the theory of infinite $\mathbb{F}_p$-vector spaces, the theory of the generic $k$-hypergraph is the universal theory which is $k$-trace definable in the theory of a set with two elements, and the theory of Uryshon space is the universal theory which is $2$-trace definable in the theory of $(\mathbb{R}; +, <)$. We construct the universal theory $D_k(T)$ which is $k$-trace definable in an arbitrary theory $T$. |
| title | Trace definability IV: higher arity notions |
| topic | Logic |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19513 |