Understanding Inference Scaling for LLMs: Bottlenecks, Trade-offs, and Performance Principles

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arif, Moiz, Maurya, Avinash, Vazhkudai, Sudharshan, Nicolae, Bogdan
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866910236451799040
author Arif, Moiz
Maurya, Avinash
Vazhkudai, Sudharshan
Nicolae, Bogdan
author_facet Arif, Moiz
Maurya, Avinash
Vazhkudai, Sudharshan
Nicolae, Bogdan
contents The transition from standard generative AI to \emph{reasoning-centric architectures}, exemplified by models capable of extensive Chain-of-Thought~(CoT) processing, marks a fundamental paradigm shift in system requirements. Unlike traditional workloads dominated by compute-bound prefill, reasoning workloads generate long chains of reasoning tokens that shift inference into a \emph{Capacity-Bound regime}. This paper presents a comprehensive system characterization, evaluating models ranging from 8B to 671B parameters on GPUs clusters. By systematically exploring the interplay between Data, Tensor, and Pipeline parallelism, we identify critical bottlenecks that defy standard scaling heuristics. Our analysis reveals that data parallelism is throughput efficient for small models but hits a capacity trap on reasoning workloads as KV-cache fragmentation forces early throttling resulting in sub-optimal compute utilization. Tensor parallelism unlocks stranded memory and delivers sublinear gains near the 32B crossover. At frontier scale, dense models (e.g., Llama-405B) are interconnect and memory-bandwidth bound and favor high-degree TP, while sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) are limited by routing and synchronization latency and benefit from hybrid strategies. These insights provide a rigorous decision framework for navigating the reasoning cliff, establishing new architectural imperatives for the next generation of inference infrastructure.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_19775
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Understanding Inference Scaling for LLMs: Bottlenecks, Trade-offs, and Performance Principles
Arif, Moiz
Maurya, Avinash
Vazhkudai, Sudharshan
Nicolae, Bogdan
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
Performance
The transition from standard generative AI to \emph{reasoning-centric architectures}, exemplified by models capable of extensive Chain-of-Thought~(CoT) processing, marks a fundamental paradigm shift in system requirements. Unlike traditional workloads dominated by compute-bound prefill, reasoning workloads generate long chains of reasoning tokens that shift inference into a \emph{Capacity-Bound regime}. This paper presents a comprehensive system characterization, evaluating models ranging from 8B to 671B parameters on GPUs clusters. By systematically exploring the interplay between Data, Tensor, and Pipeline parallelism, we identify critical bottlenecks that defy standard scaling heuristics. Our analysis reveals that data parallelism is throughput efficient for small models but hits a capacity trap on reasoning workloads as KV-cache fragmentation forces early throttling resulting in sub-optimal compute utilization. Tensor parallelism unlocks stranded memory and delivers sublinear gains near the 32B crossover. At frontier scale, dense models (e.g., Llama-405B) are interconnect and memory-bandwidth bound and favor high-degree TP, while sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) are limited by routing and synchronization latency and benefit from hybrid strategies. These insights provide a rigorous decision framework for navigating the reasoning cliff, establishing new architectural imperatives for the next generation of inference infrastructure.
title Understanding Inference Scaling for LLMs: Bottlenecks, Trade-offs, and Performance Principles
topic Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
Performance
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19775