Can Vision Models Truly Forget? Mirage: Representation-Level Certification of Visual Unlearning

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Zhenyu, Zeng, Yangchen, Meng, Chunlei, Yao, Guangzhen, Zhou, Shuigeng
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910278444122112
author Yu, Zhenyu
Zeng, Yangchen
Meng, Chunlei
Yao, Guangzhen
Zhou, Shuigeng
author_facet Yu, Zhenyu
Zeng, Yangchen
Meng, Chunlei
Yao, Guangzhen
Zhou, Shuigeng
contents Machine unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) has attracted growing interest, yet existing methods certify forgetting solely using output-level metrics. We challenge these claims by introducing Mirage, a representation-level auditing framework comprising four complementary diagnostics: Linear Probe Recovery (LPR), Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA), Feature Separability Scoring, and Layer-Wise Recovery Analysis. Through experiments across seven datasets and seven baseline methods following recent VFL unlearning protocols, Mirage reveals three key findings: (i) Forgetting gap: methods that pass output-level certification still retain substantial class structure in their representations, with LPR exceeding the retrained baseline by up to 15.4 points; CKA shows these models remain structurally closer to the original than to the retrained reference, while separability scores indicate persistent geometric discrimination. (ii) Unlearning trilemma: no existing method simultaneously achieves high utility, output-level forgetting, and representation-level forgetting. (iii) Class-sample asymmetry: class-level forgetting leaves strong representational traces (LPR up to 97%), whereas sample-level forgetting is indistinguishable from chance (LPR approx. 50%); layer-wise analysis further shows residual class information persists across network depths. These findings call for representation-aware evaluation standards in federated unlearning research.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_20282
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Can Vision Models Truly Forget? Mirage: Representation-Level Certification of Visual Unlearning
Yu, Zhenyu
Zeng, Yangchen
Meng, Chunlei
Yao, Guangzhen
Zhou, Shuigeng
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
Machine unlearning in Vertical Federated Learning (VFL) has attracted growing interest, yet existing methods certify forgetting solely using output-level metrics. We challenge these claims by introducing Mirage, a representation-level auditing framework comprising four complementary diagnostics: Linear Probe Recovery (LPR), Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA), Feature Separability Scoring, and Layer-Wise Recovery Analysis. Through experiments across seven datasets and seven baseline methods following recent VFL unlearning protocols, Mirage reveals three key findings: (i) Forgetting gap: methods that pass output-level certification still retain substantial class structure in their representations, with LPR exceeding the retrained baseline by up to 15.4 points; CKA shows these models remain structurally closer to the original than to the retrained reference, while separability scores indicate persistent geometric discrimination. (ii) Unlearning trilemma: no existing method simultaneously achieves high utility, output-level forgetting, and representation-level forgetting. (iii) Class-sample asymmetry: class-level forgetting leaves strong representational traces (LPR up to 97%), whereas sample-level forgetting is indistinguishable from chance (LPR approx. 50%); layer-wise analysis further shows residual class information persists across network depths. These findings call for representation-aware evaluation standards in federated unlearning research.
title Can Vision Models Truly Forget? Mirage: Representation-Level Certification of Visual Unlearning
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20282