Cover Image

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Almukhtar, Mohamed, Ghammam, Anwar, Ming, Hua
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

AI builds, We Analyze: An Empirical Study of AI-Generated Build Code Quality
by: Ghammam, Anwar, et al.
Published: (2026)

From Code Changes to Quality Gains: An Empirical Study in Python ML Systems with PyQu
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2025)

Build Code Needs Maintenance Too: A Study on Refactoring and Technical Debt in Build Systems
by: Ghammam, Anwar, et al.
Published: (2025)

SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback
by: Kumar, Deepak
Published: (2026)

When AI Teammates Meet Code Review: Collaboration Signals Shaping the Integration of Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Nachuma, Costain, et al.
Published: (2026)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Pull Requests as a Training Signal for Repo-Level Code Editing
by: Zhu, Qinglin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Why Are AI Agent Involved Pull Requests (Fix-Related) Remain Unmerged? An Empirical Study
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2026)

MELT: Mining Effective Lightweight Transformations from Pull Requests
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
by: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Where Do AI Coding Agents Fail? An Empirical Study of Failed Agentic Pull Requests in GitHub
by: Ehsani, Ramtin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

More Code, Less Reuse: Investigating Code Quality and Reviewer Sentiment towards AI-generated Pull Requests
by: Huang, Haoming, et al.
Published: (2026)

On Wasted Contributions: Understanding the Dynamics of Contributor-Abandoned Pull Requests
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2021)

Predicting the First Response Latency of Maintainers and Contributors in Pull Requests
by: Khatoonabadi, SayedHassan, et al.
Published: (2023)

On Unified Prompt Tuning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Chen, Xinyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Multi-Agent Coordinated Rename Refactoring
by: Bellur, Abhiram, et al.
Published: (2026)

Refactoring Codebases through Library Design
by: Kovacic, Ziga, et al.
Published: (2025)

Knowledge-Guided Prompt Learning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Li, Lin, et al.
Published: (2024)

AI-Assisted Unit Test Writing and Test-Driven Code Refactoring: A Case Study
by: Smolic, Ema, et al.
Published: (2026)

Refactoring with LLMs: Bridging Human Expertise and Machine Understanding
by: Piao, Yonnel Chen Kuang, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
by: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Published: (2025)

Leveraging LLMs, IDEs, and Semantic Embeddings for Automated Move Method Refactoring
by: Bellur, Abhiram, et al.
Published: (2025)

AutoFeedback: An LLM-based Framework for Efficient and Accurate API Request Generation
by: Liu, Huanxi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

RefAgent: A Multi-agent LLM-based Framework for Automatic Software Refactoring
by: Oueslati, Khouloud, et al.
Published: (2025)

CodeTaste: Can LLMs Generate Human-Level Code Refactorings?
by: Thillen, Alex, et al.
Published: (2026)

AI-Driven Code Refactoring: Using Graph Neural Networks to Enhance Software Maintainability
by: Bandarupalli, Gopichand
Published: (2025)

How AI Coding Agents Modify Code: A Large-Scale Study of GitHub Pull Requests
by: Ogenrwot, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2026)

PyGen: A Collaborative Human-AI Approach to Python Package Creation
by: Barua, Saikat, et al.
Published: (2024)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

AI Code in the Wild: Measuring Security Risks and Ecosystem Shifts of AI-Generated Code in Modern Software
by: Wang, Bin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Trust Calibration in IDEs: Paving the Way for Widespread Adoption of AI Refactoring
by: Borg, Markus
Published: (2024)

A.S.E: A Repository-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Security in AI-Generated Code
by: Lian, Keke, et al.
Published: (2025)

Autoregressive, Yet Revisable: In Decoding Revision for Secure Code Generation
by: Yang, Chengran, et al.
Published: (2026)

Factors Influencing the Quality of AI-Generated Code: A Synthesis of Empirical Evidence
by: Geruslu, Vehid, et al.
Published: (2026)

From Translation to Superset: Benchmark-Driven Evolution of a Production AI Agent from Rust to Python
by: Wang, Jinhua, et al.
Published: (2026)

Evaluating AI-generated code for C++, Fortran, Go, Java, Julia, Matlab, Python, R, and Rust
by: Diehl, Patrick, et al.
Published: (2024)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)