Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy?
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914583651811328 |
|---|---|
| author | Kıbrıs, Cihad Elbers, Willem Akarsu, Özgür Di Valentino, Eleonora |
| author_facet | Kıbrıs, Cihad Elbers, Willem Akarsu, Özgür Di Valentino, Eleonora |
| contents | Recent cosmological analyses based on DESI and CMB data have revealed a tension between the inferred sum of neutrino masses and the minimum value allowed by neutrino oscillation experiments, when assuming an underlying $Λ$CDM model of cosmology. In this work, we perform a systematic exploration of alternative dark energy models, including models that can supply a negative dark energy density capable of reproducing the cosmological effects of negative effective neutrino masses. We argue that dark energy models can alleviate the tension by modifying the cosmic expansion rate over a specific redshift range relevant for CMB lensing, while matching BAO distance measurements from DESI at lower redshifts. Among the models considered, we find that a sign-switching cosmological constant model, $Λ_\mathrm{s}$CDM, is uniquely capable of recovering positive neutrino masses by modifying the expansion history in this way. For the combination of DESI DR2 BAO, CMB, and DES-Dovekie supernova data, the constraint on the effective neutrino mass shifts from $\sum m_{ν,\mathrm{eff}}=-0.075^{+0.039}_{-0.053}$ eV (68%) for $Λ$CDM to $\sum m_{ν,\mathrm{eff}}=0.055\pm0.050$ eV (68%) for $Λ_\mathrm{s}$CDM, with a 95% lower bound on the dark energy transition redshift, $z_\dagger>2.4$. Although $Λ_\mathrm{s}$CDM does not have the strongest overall statistical support among the models considered, when the $\sum m_{ν,\mathrm{eff}}$ parameter is allowed to vary, our findings point toward a specific sign- and redshift-structured contribution to the late-time expansion history as a viable way to alleviate the neutrino mass tension. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_21456 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy? Kıbrıs, Cihad Elbers, Willem Akarsu, Özgür Di Valentino, Eleonora Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics Recent cosmological analyses based on DESI and CMB data have revealed a tension between the inferred sum of neutrino masses and the minimum value allowed by neutrino oscillation experiments, when assuming an underlying $Λ$CDM model of cosmology. In this work, we perform a systematic exploration of alternative dark energy models, including models that can supply a negative dark energy density capable of reproducing the cosmological effects of negative effective neutrino masses. We argue that dark energy models can alleviate the tension by modifying the cosmic expansion rate over a specific redshift range relevant for CMB lensing, while matching BAO distance measurements from DESI at lower redshifts. Among the models considered, we find that a sign-switching cosmological constant model, $Λ_\mathrm{s}$CDM, is uniquely capable of recovering positive neutrino masses by modifying the expansion history in this way. For the combination of DESI DR2 BAO, CMB, and DES-Dovekie supernova data, the constraint on the effective neutrino mass shifts from $\sum m_{ν,\mathrm{eff}}=-0.075^{+0.039}_{-0.053}$ eV (68%) for $Λ$CDM to $\sum m_{ν,\mathrm{eff}}=0.055\pm0.050$ eV (68%) for $Λ_\mathrm{s}$CDM, with a 95% lower bound on the dark energy transition redshift, $z_\dagger>2.4$. Although $Λ_\mathrm{s}$CDM does not have the strongest overall statistical support among the models considered, when the $\sum m_{ν,\mathrm{eff}}$ parameter is allowed to vary, our findings point toward a specific sign- and redshift-structured contribution to the late-time expansion history as a viable way to alleviate the neutrino mass tension. |
| title | Negative neutrino mass or negative dark energy? |
| topic | Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21456 |