Enregistré dans:
| Auteurs principaux: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Publié: |
2026
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21878 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
| _version_ | 1866911703602561024 |
|---|---|
| author | Bukhari, Hassaan A. Abbaraju, Vikram Patel, Jay Clarkson, Becky Tyagi, Shachi Damaser, Margot S. Majerus, Steve J. A. |
| author_facet | Bukhari, Hassaan A. Abbaraju, Vikram Patel, Jay Clarkson, Becky Tyagi, Shachi Damaser, Margot S. Majerus, Steve J. A. |
| contents | Objective: Conventional urodynamics (UDS) provide critical diagnostic information, but requires invasive dual catheterization and manual labeling of clinically important events. Wireless, catheter-free bladder function tests are becoming available for home use, but only provide vesical pressure (Pves). We developed a machine learning framework that was trained and externally validated on UDS data for automated urological event classification from single-channel (Pves) recordings. Methods: We analyzed 118 annotated UDS traces segmented into 0.8-second Pves intervals. Using the discrete wavelet transform, we extracted 55 statistical features per segment. Consecutive segments (233,338 segments; three classes) sharing the same class, abdominal (ABD), detrusor overactivity (DO), or voiding contraction (VOID), were grouped into events, and median feature aggregation was applied to derive event-level representations. Using an imbalanced dataset, we trained a two-stage multilayer perceptron (MLP): Stage 1 distinguished VOID vs non-VOID, and Stage 2 classified non-VOID into ABD and DO. The model was trained on two independent datasets and externally validated on a third independent dataset. Additional cross-dataset training-validation permutations were performed to assess generalizability. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-macro, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Stage 1 (VOID vs. non-VOID) achieved 84% accuracy (balanced accuracy 76%), F1-macro 0.74, and AUC 0.85, while Stage 2 (ABD vs. DO) reached 90% accuracy (balanced accuracy 80%), F1-macro 0.80, and AUC 0.87. Permutation feature importance indicated that most features contributed meaningfully. Conclusion: Our machine learning approach enables accurate automated detection of urological events from Pves, demonstrating feasibility for single-channel monitoring and future ambulatory applications. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_21878 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Automated Detection of Urological Events in Bladder Pressure Signals with a Two-Stage Machine Learning Framework Validated on External Datasets Bukhari, Hassaan A. Abbaraju, Vikram Patel, Jay Clarkson, Becky Tyagi, Shachi Damaser, Margot S. Majerus, Steve J. A. Signal Processing Objective: Conventional urodynamics (UDS) provide critical diagnostic information, but requires invasive dual catheterization and manual labeling of clinically important events. Wireless, catheter-free bladder function tests are becoming available for home use, but only provide vesical pressure (Pves). We developed a machine learning framework that was trained and externally validated on UDS data for automated urological event classification from single-channel (Pves) recordings. Methods: We analyzed 118 annotated UDS traces segmented into 0.8-second Pves intervals. Using the discrete wavelet transform, we extracted 55 statistical features per segment. Consecutive segments (233,338 segments; three classes) sharing the same class, abdominal (ABD), detrusor overactivity (DO), or voiding contraction (VOID), were grouped into events, and median feature aggregation was applied to derive event-level representations. Using an imbalanced dataset, we trained a two-stage multilayer perceptron (MLP): Stage 1 distinguished VOID vs non-VOID, and Stage 2 classified non-VOID into ABD and DO. The model was trained on two independent datasets and externally validated on a third independent dataset. Additional cross-dataset training-validation permutations were performed to assess generalizability. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-macro, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Stage 1 (VOID vs. non-VOID) achieved 84% accuracy (balanced accuracy 76%), F1-macro 0.74, and AUC 0.85, while Stage 2 (ABD vs. DO) reached 90% accuracy (balanced accuracy 80%), F1-macro 0.80, and AUC 0.87. Permutation feature importance indicated that most features contributed meaningfully. Conclusion: Our machine learning approach enables accurate automated detection of urological events from Pves, demonstrating feasibility for single-channel monitoring and future ambulatory applications. |
| title | Automated Detection of Urological Events in Bladder Pressure Signals with a Two-Stage Machine Learning Framework Validated on External Datasets |
| topic | Signal Processing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21878 |