Lost in the Prefix: Revisiting IP Geolocation Accuracy Across Networks and Geographies

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nabi, Syed Tauhidun, Bliton, Jocelyn, Chung, Tijay, Hasan, Shaddi
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866914585605308416
author Nabi, Syed Tauhidun
Bliton, Jocelyn
Chung, Tijay
Hasan, Shaddi
author_facet Nabi, Syed Tauhidun
Bliton, Jocelyn
Chung, Tijay
Hasan, Shaddi
contents IP geolocation databases are widely used in research, policy, and industry, yet their accuracy across network types and geographies remains poorly characterized. We present a large scale evaluation of four major providers (MaxMind GeoLite2, IPinfo, IP2Location, and DB-IP) using ground truth from RIPE Atlas and UNICEF Giga across 175 countries. We find that mobile networks exhibit median errors more than 10 times higher than fixed networks across all providers (179--207~km vs.\ 3--16~km), and that Global South regions show significantly higher failure rates than Global North: Asia exceeds 53--61\% and Africa 66--72\%, compared to 9--20\% in Europe. We trace both gaps to a shared structural source: provider prefixes in mobile networks and Global South geographies are more likely to be coarser than BGP announcements, and approximately 70\% of mobile prefixes span more than 100~km geographically. Our findings point to prefix granularity as a common explanatory factor: coarser prefixes consistently produce the highest errors regardless of provider, network type, or geography.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_21937
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Lost in the Prefix: Revisiting IP Geolocation Accuracy Across Networks and Geographies
Nabi, Syed Tauhidun
Bliton, Jocelyn
Chung, Tijay
Hasan, Shaddi
Networking and Internet Architecture
IP geolocation databases are widely used in research, policy, and industry, yet their accuracy across network types and geographies remains poorly characterized. We present a large scale evaluation of four major providers (MaxMind GeoLite2, IPinfo, IP2Location, and DB-IP) using ground truth from RIPE Atlas and UNICEF Giga across 175 countries. We find that mobile networks exhibit median errors more than 10 times higher than fixed networks across all providers (179--207~km vs.\ 3--16~km), and that Global South regions show significantly higher failure rates than Global North: Asia exceeds 53--61\% and Africa 66--72\%, compared to 9--20\% in Europe. We trace both gaps to a shared structural source: provider prefixes in mobile networks and Global South geographies are more likely to be coarser than BGP announcements, and approximately 70\% of mobile prefixes span more than 100~km geographically. Our findings point to prefix granularity as a common explanatory factor: coarser prefixes consistently produce the highest errors regardless of provider, network type, or geography.
title Lost in the Prefix: Revisiting IP Geolocation Accuracy Across Networks and Geographies
topic Networking and Internet Architecture
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21937