Towards Direct Evaluation of Harness Optimizers via Priority Ranking

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn, Kang, Minseok, Choi, Dongwook, Cho, Junhee, Kim, Seungju, Lim, Seungwon, Jang, Geunha, Oh, Minwoo, Jeong, Bogyung, Kim, Sunghwan, Kwon, Taeyoon, Yeo, Jinyoung
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910246198312960
author Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn
Kang, Minseok
Choi, Dongwook
Cho, Junhee
Kim, Seungju
Lim, Seungwon
Jang, Geunha
Oh, Minwoo
Jeong, Bogyung
Kim, Sunghwan
Kwon, Taeyoon
Yeo, Jinyoung
author_facet Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn
Kang, Minseok
Choi, Dongwook
Cho, Junhee
Kim, Seungju
Lim, Seungwon
Jang, Geunha
Oh, Minwoo
Jeong, Bogyung
Kim, Sunghwan
Kwon, Taeyoon
Yeo, Jinyoung
contents Harness optimization enables automated agent creation by having an optimizer agent iteratively update the harness of target agents. Despite its success, current studies evaluate optimizers solely by observing target agents' performance gains. This indirect end-improvement evaluation neglects optimizers' actions at intermediate steps, which are often erroneous and hinder agent performance. Therefore, it is unclear whether harness optimization is driven by optimizers' informed update actions or simply trial-and-error. This necessitates direct evaluation of harness optimizers. However, evaluating harness optimizers directly is non-trivial and costly due to the lack of oracle harnesses. To address this, we present a simple, low-cost design to directly evaluate them, namely priority ranking. By asking harness optimizers to rank components (e.g., tools) in a given harness by their potential to improve/hinder agent performance when updated, our design quantifies optimizer ability at the step level without expensive rollouts or manual examination. More importantly, optimizers' ranking performance correlates with their ability to improve agents in actual multi-step harness optimization, establishing priority ranking as a reliable predictor of optimization ability. Priority ranking is enabled by Shor, a collection of 182 human-verified optimization scenarios spanning across domains, designs, and time stages. Codes and data can be found at https://github.com/k59118/Harness_Optimizer_Evaluation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_22505
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Towards Direct Evaluation of Harness Optimizers via Priority Ranking
Ong, Kai Tzu-iunn
Kang, Minseok
Choi, Dongwook
Cho, Junhee
Kim, Seungju
Lim, Seungwon
Jang, Geunha
Oh, Minwoo
Jeong, Bogyung
Kim, Sunghwan
Kwon, Taeyoon
Yeo, Jinyoung
Artificial Intelligence
Harness optimization enables automated agent creation by having an optimizer agent iteratively update the harness of target agents. Despite its success, current studies evaluate optimizers solely by observing target agents' performance gains. This indirect end-improvement evaluation neglects optimizers' actions at intermediate steps, which are often erroneous and hinder agent performance. Therefore, it is unclear whether harness optimization is driven by optimizers' informed update actions or simply trial-and-error. This necessitates direct evaluation of harness optimizers. However, evaluating harness optimizers directly is non-trivial and costly due to the lack of oracle harnesses. To address this, we present a simple, low-cost design to directly evaluate them, namely priority ranking. By asking harness optimizers to rank components (e.g., tools) in a given harness by their potential to improve/hinder agent performance when updated, our design quantifies optimizer ability at the step level without expensive rollouts or manual examination. More importantly, optimizers' ranking performance correlates with their ability to improve agents in actual multi-step harness optimization, establishing priority ranking as a reliable predictor of optimization ability. Priority ranking is enabled by Shor, a collection of 182 human-verified optimization scenarios spanning across domains, designs, and time stages. Codes and data can be found at https://github.com/k59118/Harness_Optimizer_Evaluation.
title Towards Direct Evaluation of Harness Optimizers via Priority Ranking
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22505