Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdelnabi, Sahar, Hicks, Chris, Rieck, Konrad, Sadeghi, Ahmad-Reza
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22568
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Table of Contents:
  • The benchmarks used to evaluate AI agents in security-critical roles suffer from crucial weaknesses. Building on recent empirical evidence, we characterize three core challenges that undermine security evaluations: benchmark vulnerabilities, temporal staleness, and runtime uncertainty. We then outline practical directions toward building more robust and trustworthy evaluation frameworks.