Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2026
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23136 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Inhaltsangabe:
- We present an extinction-calibrated, Gaia-source-level QSO candidate catalog for selected fields, designed as a high-purity input catalog for fiber-spectroscopic follow-up rather than as an all-sky QSO census. The deployed selector uses Gaia astrometry and photometry, optical/infrared catalog features, and E(B-V)-binned threshold calibration; spectra are used only during training via a source-grouped spectrum-teacher model. The sample definition is layered: a four-field core domain ladder provides the main validation baseline, four application/stress-test fields probe portability, and COSMOS is treated separately as an Extreme Deep boundary case. At the recommended conservative operating point, calibrated to a validation-set purity of 0.98, the P3 spectrum-informed catalog selector achieves a measured test-set purity of 0.9809 and a spectroscopic-label completeness of 0.8869 within the frozen Gaia-linked benchmark, whereas the Gaia official QSO probability yields a spectroscopic-label completeness of 0.4493 under the same threshold protocol. The evaluation protocol excludes downstream validation/test Gaia source IDs from teacher fitting and checkpoint selection, and uses teacher probabilities only for downstream training rows. Relative to the earlier P2 teacher, P3 yields a modest mean completeness gain across five seeds, with a small decrease in purity and a small increase in false positives; the gain is most evident in higher-extinction and faint-source diagnostics. The released product is a catalog and empirical selection-function data product with source identifiers, field-layer assignments, input-coverage flags, calibrated scores, threshold flags, validation metadata, and provenance/QC fields. In COSMOS, the Gaia-linked parent set is much shallower than COSMOS2020; the robust 39-object subset is interpreted as a purity-oriented priority list rather than a completeness measurement.