Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aryal, Manish, Azam, Faiyaz, Banerjee, Agnivo, Jayanthi, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan, Laro, Allegra, Legentilhomme, Clément, Lin, Andrew, Lorkowski, Florian, Rakhshandehroo, Radman, Rommel, Patric, Ruzak, Emanuel, Theng, Nathan, Rapoport, Paul Yushin
Format: Preprint
Published: 2026
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23146
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910247493304320
author Aryal, Manish
Azam, Faiyaz
Banerjee, Agnivo
Jayanthi, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan
Laro, Allegra
Legentilhomme, Clément
Lin, Andrew
Lorkowski, Florian
Rakhshandehroo, Radman
Rommel, Patric
Ruzak, Emanuel
Theng, Nathan
Rapoport, Paul Yushin
author_facet Aryal, Manish
Azam, Faiyaz
Banerjee, Agnivo
Jayanthi, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan
Laro, Allegra
Legentilhomme, Clément
Lin, Andrew
Lorkowski, Florian
Rakhshandehroo, Radman
Rommel, Patric
Ruzak, Emanuel
Theng, Nathan
Rapoport, Paul Yushin
contents Classical reinforcement learning assumes the agent interacts with a fixed environment whose behavior does not depend on the agent's policy. This assumption breaks down in non-realizable settings where other actors might anticipate the agent's behavior, including environments crucial to AI safety, where the agent interacts with predictors, humans, other AI agents, and institutions. In such settings, the agent's model class fails to capture the world in which it operates. Under such misspecification, classical Bayesian methods can produce confidently wrong posteriors, unreliable decisions, and unbounded regret, as realizability fails to obtain. Infra-Bayesianism is a decision-theoretic framework that addresses these failures by distinguishing ordinary probabilistic uncertainty, where priors can be reasonably chosen, from Knightian uncertainty, where no grounds exist for the construction of such a prior. It does so by evaluating actions on their worst-case outcomes, rather than from posterior expectations or weighted averaging. We present the first proof-of-concept implementation of an infra-Bayesian reinforcement learning architecture for finite-outcome stateless decision problems. Our agent maintains a set of imprecise hypotheses, updates them using infra-Bayesian conditioning, and selects actions by maximizing worst-case expected value. We apply this implementation of the infra-Bayesian maximin decision process to an environment with Knightian uncertainty, and demonstrate a lower worst-case regret as compared to classical reinforcement learning agents. We also investigate Newcomb's problem and show that the infra-Bayesian agent picks the optimal strategy, outperforming classical decision theory agents. Our results provide a step towards reinforcement learning agents that remain robust under model misspecification and policy-dependent uncertainty.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_23146
institution arXiv
publishDate 2026
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
Aryal, Manish
Azam, Faiyaz
Banerjee, Agnivo
Jayanthi, Sai Sidhanth Manoharan
Laro, Allegra
Legentilhomme, Clément
Lin, Andrew
Lorkowski, Florian
Rakhshandehroo, Radman
Rommel, Patric
Ruzak, Emanuel
Theng, Nathan
Rapoport, Paul Yushin
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Classical reinforcement learning assumes the agent interacts with a fixed environment whose behavior does not depend on the agent's policy. This assumption breaks down in non-realizable settings where other actors might anticipate the agent's behavior, including environments crucial to AI safety, where the agent interacts with predictors, humans, other AI agents, and institutions. In such settings, the agent's model class fails to capture the world in which it operates. Under such misspecification, classical Bayesian methods can produce confidently wrong posteriors, unreliable decisions, and unbounded regret, as realizability fails to obtain. Infra-Bayesianism is a decision-theoretic framework that addresses these failures by distinguishing ordinary probabilistic uncertainty, where priors can be reasonably chosen, from Knightian uncertainty, where no grounds exist for the construction of such a prior. It does so by evaluating actions on their worst-case outcomes, rather than from posterior expectations or weighted averaging. We present the first proof-of-concept implementation of an infra-Bayesian reinforcement learning architecture for finite-outcome stateless decision problems. Our agent maintains a set of imprecise hypotheses, updates them using infra-Bayesian conditioning, and selects actions by maximizing worst-case expected value. We apply this implementation of the infra-Bayesian maximin decision process to an environment with Knightian uncertainty, and demonstrate a lower worst-case regret as compared to classical reinforcement learning agents. We also investigate Newcomb's problem and show that the infra-Bayesian agent picks the optimal strategy, outperforming classical decision theory agents. Our results provide a step towards reinforcement learning agents that remain robust under model misspecification and policy-dependent uncertainty.
title Infra-Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Agents Outperform Classical RL For Worst-Case Robustness
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23146