IntentionNav: A Benchmark for Intent-Driven Object Navigation from Implicit Human Instruction
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916038222807040 |
|---|---|
| author | Qian, Lin Li, Shijie Lin, Sihao Zhang, Xuan Liu, Bangya Li, Yanran Yin, Hujun |
| author_facet | Qian, Lin Li, Shijie Lin, Sihao Zhang, Xuan Liu, Bangya Li, Yanran Yin, Hujun |
| contents | Existing object navigation benchmarks usually tell an embodied agent which object category to find, such as microwave or chair. Human-facing embodied AI is often asked something less direct: "I need something to warm this food" or "the room feels stuffy." The agent must infer the object that can satisfy the need, find a scene-grounded instance, and decide whether the goal has been reached. We study this setting as intent-driven object navigation and introduce IntentionNav, a diagnostic benchmark for active object search from implicit human instructions. Each episode provides a free-text intent, RGB-D observations, and pose, but withholds the target object name. IntentionNav contains 500 intents over 176 Isaac Sim scenes and 64 target categories. Each intent is rewritten in four controlled instruction styles and annotated with one of four intent modes, separating surface phrasing from semantic cue type under matched geometry. This paired design supports analysis of target inference, language robustness, neighborhood reachability, and terminal success rather than only aggregate success. We evaluated three VLMs using a fixed active-navigation agent. Models identify the intended target in 48.3 percent of episodes and enter its 2 m neighborhood in 68.7 percent, but terminate successfully in only 24.9 percent and achieve grounded 1 m success in 5.5 percent. Success is highest for event-script intents (28.7 percent) and lower for physical-state and affordance intents (19.2 percent and 18.5 percent), showing that indirect human intent remains a bottleneck for target selection, visual verification, and terminal localization in active embodied search. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_23187 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | IntentionNav: A Benchmark for Intent-Driven Object Navigation from Implicit Human Instruction Qian, Lin Li, Shijie Lin, Sihao Zhang, Xuan Liu, Bangya Li, Yanran Yin, Hujun Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Robotics Existing object navigation benchmarks usually tell an embodied agent which object category to find, such as microwave or chair. Human-facing embodied AI is often asked something less direct: "I need something to warm this food" or "the room feels stuffy." The agent must infer the object that can satisfy the need, find a scene-grounded instance, and decide whether the goal has been reached. We study this setting as intent-driven object navigation and introduce IntentionNav, a diagnostic benchmark for active object search from implicit human instructions. Each episode provides a free-text intent, RGB-D observations, and pose, but withholds the target object name. IntentionNav contains 500 intents over 176 Isaac Sim scenes and 64 target categories. Each intent is rewritten in four controlled instruction styles and annotated with one of four intent modes, separating surface phrasing from semantic cue type under matched geometry. This paired design supports analysis of target inference, language robustness, neighborhood reachability, and terminal success rather than only aggregate success. We evaluated three VLMs using a fixed active-navigation agent. Models identify the intended target in 48.3 percent of episodes and enter its 2 m neighborhood in 68.7 percent, but terminate successfully in only 24.9 percent and achieve grounded 1 m success in 5.5 percent. Success is highest for event-script intents (28.7 percent) and lower for physical-state and affordance intents (19.2 percent and 18.5 percent), showing that indirect human intent remains a bottleneck for target selection, visual verification, and terminal localization in active embodied search. |
| title | IntentionNav: A Benchmark for Intent-Driven Object Navigation from Implicit Human Instruction |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Robotics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23187 |