Catching The Correct Answer Trap: Characterising AI Tutor Blind Spots When Analysing Student Reasoning
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2026
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866910249641836544 |
|---|---|
| author | Imran, Moiz Bulathwela, Sahan |
| author_facet | Imran, Moiz Bulathwela, Sahan |
| contents | Intelligent tutoring systems increasingly provide automated feedback on student work, but robust feedback requires assessing reasoning, not only final answers. We study a failure mode we call the correct answer trap (CAT): models under-detect misconceptions when students reach a correct answer via flawed reasoning. Analysing real student responses from the Eedi mathematics platform, we show that 71% of these failures concentrate in just two question types, both sharing a common structure where flawed reasoning happens to produce the correct numerical answer. Comparing a fine-tuned T5 with a frontier large language model, we find that improved capabilities reduce but do not eliminate the problem (84% vs 57% detection accuracy). Even the best-performing model generates roughly four false alarms for every genuine detection, making stand-alone screening impractical at realistic class sizes. Our findings demonstrate that high overall accuracy can mask critical failures in reasoning assessment, and that careful analysis of student reasoning still benefits from human judgment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_23925 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Catching The Correct Answer Trap: Characterising AI Tutor Blind Spots When Analysing Student Reasoning Imran, Moiz Bulathwela, Sahan Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language H.3.3; J.1; I.2.0 Intelligent tutoring systems increasingly provide automated feedback on student work, but robust feedback requires assessing reasoning, not only final answers. We study a failure mode we call the correct answer trap (CAT): models under-detect misconceptions when students reach a correct answer via flawed reasoning. Analysing real student responses from the Eedi mathematics platform, we show that 71% of these failures concentrate in just two question types, both sharing a common structure where flawed reasoning happens to produce the correct numerical answer. Comparing a fine-tuned T5 with a frontier large language model, we find that improved capabilities reduce but do not eliminate the problem (84% vs 57% detection accuracy). Even the best-performing model generates roughly four false alarms for every genuine detection, making stand-alone screening impractical at realistic class sizes. Our findings demonstrate that high overall accuracy can mask critical failures in reasoning assessment, and that careful analysis of student reasoning still benefits from human judgment. |
| title | Catching The Correct Answer Trap: Characterising AI Tutor Blind Spots When Analysing Student Reasoning |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language H.3.3; J.1; I.2.0 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23925 |