Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24770 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917528549195776 |
|---|---|
| author | Southworth, Ben S. Jiang, Shuai McBride, Daniel Cyr, Eric C. Thomas, Stephen |
| author_facet | Southworth, Ben S. Jiang, Shuai McBride, Daniel Cyr, Eric C. Thomas, Stephen |
| contents | Muon is a recently developed matrix-aware optimizer that has shown strong results in transformer training, but its behavior in vision transformers (ViTs) is not yet well understood. We study Muon for ViT training, largely on ImageNet-100 and Pl@ntNet-300K, comparing against AdamW under standard vision recipes involving mixup, cutmix, smoothing, and random augmentation and erasing. Muon consistently outperforms AdamW, with especially large gains on long-tailed Pl@ntNet macro top-1. These gains are also recipe-dependent, where Muon benefits much more than AdamW from advanced and significant data augmentation techniques. To understand this interaction, we analyze the singular-value structure of matrix gradients throughout the ViT. Within Muon training runs, removing heavy data augmentation induces a late-training spectral concentration and mode collapse in gradient matrices, primarily in deep MLP-down blocks. Under a fixed "full" augmentation recipe, the clearest Muon-AdamW contrast appears instead in QKV gradients, where AdamW gradient energy remains concentrated in a much narrower basis while Muon spreads energy across substantially more singular modes. Muon in ViTs is therefore best understood as an optimizer-recipe interaction. Under a fixed recipe, Muon differs from AdamW most clearly in attention projections, where its gradients consist of a broader spectral basis. Within Muon, a full training recipe is important for preventing late spectral concentration and mode collapse in deep feedforward blocks. We further demonstrate efficacy in training ViTs on image segmentation and masked autoencoder models, where Muon outperforms AdamW in all settings considered. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_24770 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Muon in Vision Transformers: Optimizer-Recipe Interactions and Gradient Spectra Southworth, Ben S. Jiang, Shuai McBride, Daniel Cyr, Eric C. Thomas, Stephen Machine Learning Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Muon is a recently developed matrix-aware optimizer that has shown strong results in transformer training, but its behavior in vision transformers (ViTs) is not yet well understood. We study Muon for ViT training, largely on ImageNet-100 and Pl@ntNet-300K, comparing against AdamW under standard vision recipes involving mixup, cutmix, smoothing, and random augmentation and erasing. Muon consistently outperforms AdamW, with especially large gains on long-tailed Pl@ntNet macro top-1. These gains are also recipe-dependent, where Muon benefits much more than AdamW from advanced and significant data augmentation techniques. To understand this interaction, we analyze the singular-value structure of matrix gradients throughout the ViT. Within Muon training runs, removing heavy data augmentation induces a late-training spectral concentration and mode collapse in gradient matrices, primarily in deep MLP-down blocks. Under a fixed "full" augmentation recipe, the clearest Muon-AdamW contrast appears instead in QKV gradients, where AdamW gradient energy remains concentrated in a much narrower basis while Muon spreads energy across substantially more singular modes. Muon in ViTs is therefore best understood as an optimizer-recipe interaction. Under a fixed recipe, Muon differs from AdamW most clearly in attention projections, where its gradients consist of a broader spectral basis. Within Muon, a full training recipe is important for preventing late spectral concentration and mode collapse in deep feedforward blocks. We further demonstrate efficacy in training ViTs on image segmentation and masked autoencoder models, where Muon outperforms AdamW in all settings considered. |
| title | Muon in Vision Transformers: Optimizer-Recipe Interactions and Gradient Spectra |
| topic | Machine Learning Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24770 |