Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917529287393280 |
|---|---|
| author | Su, Buxin Zhang, Jiayao Collina, Natalie Yan, Yuling Li, Didong Cho, Kyunghyun Fan, Jianqing Roth, Aaron Su, Weijie |
| author_facet | Su, Buxin Zhang, Jiayao Collina, Natalie Yan, Yuling Li, Didong Cho, Kyunghyun Fan, Jianqing Roth, Aaron Su, Weijie |
| contents | This article is the rejoinder to ``The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review,'' to appear in the Journal of the American Statistical Association with discussion. To address the practical and theoretical points raised by the discussants, we organize our response around four core themes: (i) formulating peer review as a statistical estimation problem; (ii) mitigating equity and strategic concerns in the deployment of the Isotonic Mechanism; (iii) incorporating complementary signals such as reviewer rankings and structured metadata; and (iv) exploring a human-centered framework for peer review in the era of generative AI. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2605_25172 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2026 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review Su, Buxin Zhang, Jiayao Collina, Natalie Yan, Yuling Li, Didong Cho, Kyunghyun Fan, Jianqing Roth, Aaron Su, Weijie Applications Digital Libraries Machine Learning This article is the rejoinder to ``The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review,'' to appear in the Journal of the American Statistical Association with discussion. To address the practical and theoretical points raised by the discussants, we organize our response around four core themes: (i) formulating peer review as a statistical estimation problem; (ii) mitigating equity and strategic concerns in the deployment of the Isotonic Mechanism; (iii) incorporating complementary signals such as reviewer rankings and structured metadata; and (iv) exploring a human-centered framework for peer review in the era of generative AI. |
| title | Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review |
| topic | Applications Digital Libraries Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.25172 |